Real effect of the US Green New Deal

Purpose The US Green New Deal (GND) is a proposal calling for political action to tackle climate change. Its aim is to adopt policies that support the achievement of carbon neutral; however, it has encountered significant obstacles in being passed as legislation. Some of this resistance is based on concerns relating to the potential consequences of climate actions on asset values. Design/methodology/approach Following Barraclough et al. (2013), this study uses option prices of fossil fuel firms to estimate the probability of GND passage across four voting events: the 2019 GND proposal, the 2021 Build Back Better Act (BBBA) and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in Senate and House votes. Findings The estimated passing probabilities for the GND, BBBA, IRA (Senate) and IRA (House) are 46.74%, 49.84%, 48.89% and 41.16%, respectively. The average value effect is negatively significant at −17.87% (US$−1.83bn), −5.10% (US$551.81m), −15.08% (US$−2.73 bn) and −11.66% (US$−2.65 bn), respectively, for four events. The average news effect is positively significant at 6.28% (US$533.48m), 2.27% (US$254.43m), 7.13% (US$1.31 bn) and 5.23% (US$1.15 bn), respectively, for four events. Furthermore, I find that the value effects of the proposal are more pronounced for fossil fuel firms with higher carbon emissions. Originality/value Traditional event studies estimate the ex post effect of an event using abnormal returns, whereas this research argues that the market anticipates the event's impact, necessitating consideration of the ex ante effect as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-08-2025-0435
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real effect of the US Green New Deal

Xu Chen
Journal of Accounting Literature
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Real effect of the US Green New Deal

Xu Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose The US Green New Deal (GND) is a proposal calling for political action to tackle climate change. Its aim is to adopt policies that support the achievement of carbon neutral; however, it has encountered significant obstacles in being passed as legislation. Some of this resistance is based on concerns relating to the potential consequences of climate actions on asset values. Design/methodology/approach Following Barraclough et al. (2013), this study uses option prices of fossil fuel firms to estimate the probability of GND passage across four voting events: the 2019 GND proposal, the 2021 Build Back Better Act (BBBA) and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in Senate and House votes. Findings The estimated passing probabilities for the GND, BBBA, IRA (Senate) and IRA (House) are 46.74%, 49.84%, 48.89% and 41.16%, respectively. The average value effect is negatively significant at −17.87% (US$−1.83bn), −5.10% (US$551.81m), −15.08% (US$−2.73 bn) and −11.66% (US$−2.65 bn), respectively, for four events. The average news effect is positively significant at 6.28% (US$533.48m), 2.27% (US$254.43m), 7.13% (US$1.31 bn) and 5.23% (US$1.15 bn), respectively, for four events. Furthermore, I find that the value effects of the proposal are more pronounced for fossil fuel firms with higher carbon emissions. Originality/value Traditional event studies estimate the ex post effect of an event using abnormal returns, whereas this research argues that the market anticipates the event's impact, necessitating consideration of the ex ante effect as well.

Journal of Accounting Literature
Macquarie University (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.