Environmental Footprint of Diffuse Emissions in European Functional Urban Areas

ABSTRACT This paper quantifies the environmental footprint of diffuse air emissions across 776 European functional urban areas (FUAs) from 2005 to 2022 by coupling Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) gridded inventories with the Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 framework. CAMS emissions are harmonised into 12 GNFR sectors and nine pollutants, spatially allocated by GIS overlays to FUAs and surrounding territories using a largest‐overlap rule to obtain an explicit In/Out FUA split, and translated into EF 3.1 impacts through characterisation. Impacts are aggregated into a policy‐ready Weighted and Normalised Footprint Indicator (WENFIp) using EF 3.1 normalisation and weighting, with intensity (WENFId) and per‐capita (WENFIcap) derivatives. Results show an overall ~25% decline with a 2020 trough, a broadly stable In/Out FUA balance, urban burdens dominated by fossil CO 2 and PM 2.5 , and non‐urban burdens dominated by NH 3 and CH 4 . Clustering of EF profiles identifies four robust FUA archetypes, supporting differentiated, just mitigation portfolios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70780
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Footprint of Diffuse Emissions in European Functional Urban Areas

Gorka Jimenez Bueno, Iñaki Sasia, Iker Etxano
Sustainable Development
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Environmental Footprint of Diffuse Emissions in European Functional Urban Areas

Gorka Jimenez Bueno, Iñaki Sasia, Iker Etxano
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper quantifies the environmental footprint of diffuse air emissions across 776 European functional urban areas (FUAs) from 2005 to 2022 by coupling Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) gridded inventories with the Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 framework. CAMS emissions are harmonised into 12 GNFR sectors and nine pollutants, spatially allocated by GIS overlays to FUAs and surrounding territories using a largest‐overlap rule to obtain an explicit In/Out FUA split, and translated into EF 3.1 impacts through characterisation. Impacts are aggregated into a policy‐ready Weighted and Normalised Footprint Indicator (WENFIp) using EF 3.1 normalisation and weighting, with intensity (WENFId) and per‐capita (WENFIcap) derivatives. Results show an overall ~25% decline with a 2020 trough, a broadly stable In/Out FUA balance, urban burdens dominated by fossil CO 2 and PM 2.5 , and non‐urban burdens dominated by NH 3 and CH 4 . Clustering of EF profiles identifies four robust FUA archetypes, supporting differentiated, just mitigation portfolios.

Sustainable Development
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Eusko Jaurlaritza, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental Footprint of Diffuse Emissions in European Functional Urban Areas — Gorka Jimenez Bueno, Iñaki Sasia, et al. · Sustainable Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS