Considerate ramp secret sharing

Abstract In this work we revisit the fundamental findings by Chen et al. (in: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, 2007) on general information transfer in linear ramp secret sharing schemes to conclude that their method not only gives a way to establish worst case leakage (Chen et al. 2007; Kurihara et al. in IEICE Trans Fundam E95-A(11):2067–2075, 2012) and best case recovery (Chen et al. 2007; Geil et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 60(10):5938–5949, 2014) , but can also lead to additional insight on non-qualifying sets for any prescribed amount of information. We then apply this insight to schemes defined from monomial-Cartesian codes and by doing so we demonstrate that the good schemes from (Galindo et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 64(4, part 1):2444–2459, 2018, Sec. IV) have a second layer of security. Elaborating further, when given designed partial recovery numbers, in a new construction the focus is entirely on ensuring that the access structure possesses desirable second layer security, rather on what is the worst case information leakage in terms of number of participants. The particular structure of largest possible sets being not able to determine any amount of information suggests that we coin the concept of considerate ramp secret sharing schemes of which the proposed new construction is a well-structured example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Designs Codes and Cryptography
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-026-01808-y
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerate ramp secret sharing

Olav Geil
Designs Codes and Cryptography
Cryptography and Data Security
article

Considerate ramp secret sharing

Olav Geil
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this work we revisit the fundamental findings by Chen et al. (in: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, 2007) on general information transfer in linear ramp secret sharing schemes to conclude that their method not only gives a way to establish worst case leakage (Chen et al. 2007; Kurihara et al. in IEICE Trans Fundam E95-A(11):2067–2075, 2012) and best case recovery (Chen et al. 2007; Geil et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 60(10):5938–5949, 2014) , but can also lead to additional insight on non-qualifying sets for any prescribed amount of information. We then apply this insight to schemes defined from monomial-Cartesian codes and by doing so we demonstrate that the good schemes from (Galindo et al. in IEEE Trans Inf Theory 64(4, part 1):2444–2459, 2018, Sec. IV) have a second layer of security. Elaborating further, when given designed partial recovery numbers, in a new construction the focus is entirely on ensuring that the access structure possesses desirable second layer security, rather on what is the worst case information leakage in terms of number of participants. The particular structure of largest possible sets being not able to determine any amount of information suggests that we coin the concept of considerate ramp secret sharing schemes of which the proposed new construction is a well-structured example.

Designs Codes and CryptographyVol. 94(3)
Aalborg University (DK)
Aalborg Universitet
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cryptography and Data Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.