The urban greening paradox: Measuring day-night perceived safety divergences from paired street view images using generative AI

Whether nighttime is the better half of life varies across cities depending on how safe residents perceive the neighborhood environment. Although street view imagery (SVI) is instrumental in auditing perceived safety, city-wide nighttime SVI does not exist. Consequently, the extent to which day-night safety perceptions diverge remains unclear. Although emerging studies use day-to-night (D2N) translations for nighttime SVI, the model convergence and transferability are unknown. Using paired day-night SVIs from U.S. and Chinese cities, we confirmed the converging size (~2,000 pairs) and the cross-cultural transferability of the D2N model. Medium-density SVIs facilitated cross-density transferability, and US-trained models outperformed Chinese-trained models, suggesting moderate limitations in the training datasets when applying D2N models across cultures and countries. Interpretable modeling reveals a clear day–night asymmetry in perceptual mechanisms, with daytime safety perception dominated by pedestrian-oriented configuration, whereas nighttime safety perception relies more on visibility-related cues. Brightness emerges as a key positive predictor in both periods. Greening-related features contribute disproportionately to day–night divergence, amplifying differences between daytime and nighttime safety perceptions rather than uniformly enhancing perceived safety. This pattern reflects urban greening paradox, whereby tree and plant support perceived safety under daylight yet are associated with greater instability after dark. City-scale mapping in Boston reveals pronounced spatial heterogeneity, with high-perception central and north-west corridors remaining relatively safer after dark, while south areas experience the most significant nighttime declines. Our scalable GenAI framework extends urban scene studies to nighttime and enables city-wide mapping of perceived safety after sunset, informing more inclusive nighttime urban planning. • GenAI training converges with ~2,000 paired day–night street view images • Pedestrian-oriented cues shape daytime safety perception • Visibility cues shape nighttime safety perception • Greening enhances daytime safety perception but weakens it after dark • Urban greening contributes most to day–night perception divergence

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129350
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The urban greening paradox: Measuring day-night perceived safety divergences from paired street view images using generative AI

Waishan Qiu, Jiajing Dai, Yuankai Wang, Da Chen et al.
1 citations
Urban forestry & urban greening
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
36.62
article

The urban greening paradox: Measuring day-night perceived safety divergences from paired street view images using generative AI

Waishan Qiu, Jiajing Dai, Yuankai Wang, Da Chen, Jun Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Whether nighttime is the better half of life varies across cities depending on how safe residents perceive the neighborhood environment. Although street view imagery (SVI) is instrumental in auditing perceived safety, city-wide nighttime SVI does not exist. Consequently, the extent to which day-night safety perceptions diverge remains unclear. Although emerging studies use day-to-night (D2N) translations for nighttime SVI, the model convergence and transferability are unknown. Using paired day-night SVIs from U.S. and Chinese cities, we confirmed the converging size (~2,000 pairs) and the cross-cultural transferability of the D2N model. Medium-density SVIs facilitated cross-density transferability, and US-trained models outperformed Chinese-trained models, suggesting moderate limitations in the training datasets when applying D2N models across cultures and countries. Interpretable modeling reveals a clear day–night asymmetry in perceptual mechanisms, with daytime safety perception dominated by pedestrian-oriented configuration, whereas nighttime safety perception relies more on visibility-related cues. Brightness emerges as a key positive predictor in both periods. Greening-related features contribute disproportionately to day–night divergence, amplifying differences between daytime and nighttime safety perceptions rather than uniformly enhancing perceived safety. This pattern reflects urban greening paradox, whereby tree and plant support perceived safety under daylight yet are associated with greater instability after dark. City-scale mapping in Boston reveals pronounced spatial heterogeneity, with high-perception central and north-west corridors remaining relatively safer after dark, while south areas experience the most significant nighttime declines. Our scalable GenAI framework extends urban scene studies to nighttime and enables city-wide mapping of perceived safety after sunset, informing more inclusive nighttime urban planning. • GenAI training converges with ~2,000 paired day–night street view images • Pedestrian-oriented cues shape daytime safety perception • Visibility cues shape nighttime safety perception • Greening enhances daytime safety perception but weakens it after dark • Urban greening contributes most to day–night perception divergence

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 118
Family Planning Association of Hong Kong (CN), University of Bath (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.