Clinical validation of perfusion imaging with pulmonary function test data using Voronoi-based discretization

<i>Objective.</i>Accurate lung function assessment is essential for diagnosing and managing diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, pulmonary emboli, and lung cancer. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides valuable 3D functional imaging of ventilation and perfusion, but is limited by low spatial resolution, availability, additional radiation, and cost. Alternative methods, including CT-based perfusion (CT-P) and deep learning models, require large datasets to validate results that are often scarce. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) offer rapid and noninvasive global lung function measures and are clinically widely used. While ventilation correlates well with PFTs, perfusion imaging presents challenges due to complex blood flow and difficulty summarizing 3D data into one value. Additionally, commonly employed percentile scaling removes absolute quantitative information, complicating interpretation.<i>Approach.</i>We propose a framework leveraging lung discretizations based on Voronoi diagrams to capture local spatial information from raw-valued and percentile-scaled perfusion maps (SPECT and CT-P). We compute hierarchical descriptive statistics at 3 levels (intra-subvolume, inter-subvolume, left-right lungs) to derive one global value per patient.<i>Main results.</i>Across PFT measures of diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide, forced expiratory volume after one second (FEV1), and FEV1/forced vital capacity, we find that discretizing perfusion maps into Voronoi subvolumes always yields stronger Spearman correlations than not discretizing. Specifically, our approach demonstrates strong correlations of0.636⩽ρ⩽0.843(<i>P</i> < 0.005) for raw-valued (SPECT and CT-P) maps,0.590⩽ρ⩽0.789(<i>P</i> < 0.005) for percentile-scaled maps, and reliably distinguishes normal from abnormal lung function via logistic regression analysis (0.865⩽AUC⩽0.937for raw-valued maps,0.877⩽AUC⩽0.933for percentile-scaled maps).<i>Significance.</i>This framework bridges regional perfusion imaging and global pulmonary function assessment, enabling meaningful quantitative comparisons between SPECT and CT-P maps. By preserving local spatial variability, the method offers a noninvasive tool for integrating imaging and physiological data, paving the way toward broader clinical and AI-driven applications in lung function evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae4669
Primary Topic
Effects of Radiation Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical validation of perfusion imaging with pulmonary function test data using Voronoi-based discretization

R. Castillo, Yi-Kuan Liu, E. Castillo, Caleb J. Herrera et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Effects of Radiation Exposure
article

Clinical validation of perfusion imaging with pulmonary function test data using Voronoi-based discretization

R. Castillo, Yi-Kuan Liu, E. Castillo, Caleb J. Herrera, Lisa V Du, Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy, Girish Nair, Jorge Cisneros
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Accurate lung function assessment is essential for diagnosing and managing diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, pulmonary emboli, and lung cancer. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides valuable 3D functional imaging of ventilation and perfusion, but is limited by low spatial resolution, availability, additional radiation, and cost. Alternative methods, including CT-based perfusion (CT-P) and deep learning models, require large datasets to validate results that are often scarce. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) offer rapid and noninvasive global lung function measures and are clinically widely used. While ventilation correlates well with PFTs, perfusion imaging presents challenges due to complex blood flow and difficulty summarizing 3D data into one value. Additionally, commonly employed percentile scaling removes absolute quantitative information, complicating interpretation.<i>Approach.</i>We propose a framework leveraging lung discretizations based on Voronoi diagrams to capture local spatial information from raw-valued and percentile-scaled perfusion maps (SPECT and CT-P). We compute hierarchical descriptive statistics at 3 levels (intra-subvolume, inter-subvolume, left-right lungs) to derive one global value per patient.<i>Main results.</i>Across PFT measures of diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide, forced expiratory volume after one second (FEV1), and FEV1/forced vital capacity, we find that discretizing perfusion maps into Voronoi subvolumes always yields stronger Spearman correlations than not discretizing. Specifically, our approach demonstrates strong correlations of0.636⩽ρ⩽0.843(<i>P</i> < 0.005) for raw-valued (SPECT and CT-P) maps,0.590⩽ρ⩽0.789(<i>P</i> < 0.005) for percentile-scaled maps, and reliably distinguishes normal from abnormal lung function via logistic regression analysis (0.865⩽AUC⩽0.937for raw-valued maps,0.877⩽AUC⩽0.933for percentile-scaled maps).<i>Significance.</i>This framework bridges regional perfusion imaging and global pulmonary function assessment, enabling meaningful quantitative comparisons between SPECT and CT-P maps. By preserving local spatial variability, the method offers a noninvasive tool for integrating imaging and physiological data, paving the way toward broader clinical and AI-driven applications in lung function evaluation.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 71(5)
University of Kentucky (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Emory University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Effects of Radiation Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.