Up-to-date prevalence at recommended ages for discontinuing routine colorectal, cervical and lung cancer screening

Cancer screening guidelines specify ages at which routine screening should be discontinued and, except for cervical cancer screening, do not require specific screening history criteria be met for discontinuation. We estimated the prevalence of being up to date with average-risk screening guidelines for colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer as of the recommended ages for discontinuation of routine screening. We conducted a descriptive study among several U.S. healthcare systems during 2010-2019. Up-to-date screening prevalence, based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, was ascertained prior to 76th, 66th, and 81st birthdays among persons eligible for colorectal (N = 316,756 persons), cervical (N = 20,282 persons), and lung cancer (N = 1,151 persons) screening, respectively. Up-to-date screening prevalence was 84.4% for colorectal, 58.9% for cervical, and 6.3% for lung cancer screening. Up-to-date screening prevalence at the ages recommended for discontinuing routine colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer screening varied appreciably, and was particularly low for lung cancer screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag044
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Up-to-date prevalence at recommended ages for discontinuing routine colorectal, cervical and lung cancer screening

Christine M Neslund-Dudas, Douglas Corley, Michelle I. Silver, Nikki M. Carroll et al.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Up-to-date prevalence at recommended ages for discontinuing routine colorectal, cervical and lung cancer screening

Christine M Neslund-Dudas, Douglas Corley, Michelle I. Silver, Nikki M. Carroll, Aruna Kamineni, Gaia Pocobelli, Ethan A. Halm, Caryn E. S. Oshiro, Jessica Chubak, Katharine A Rendle, Natalie J Del Vecchio, Robert T Greenlee, Kara Cushing-Haugen, Christopher I Li
article en

Abstract

Cancer screening guidelines specify ages at which routine screening should be discontinued and, except for cervical cancer screening, do not require specific screening history criteria be met for discontinuation. We estimated the prevalence of being up to date with average-risk screening guidelines for colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer as of the recommended ages for discontinuation of routine screening. We conducted a descriptive study among several U.S. healthcare systems during 2010-2019. Up-to-date screening prevalence, based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, was ascertained prior to 76th, 66th, and 81st birthdays among persons eligible for colorectal (N = 316,756 persons), cervical (N = 20,282 persons), and lung cancer (N = 1,151 persons) screening, respectively. Up-to-date screening prevalence was 84.4% for colorectal, 58.9% for cervical, and 6.3% for lung cancer screening. Up-to-date screening prevalence at the ages recommended for discontinuing routine colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer screening varied appreciably, and was particularly low for lung cancer screening.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Hawaii Department of Health (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Johnson University (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Marshfield Clinic (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), Penn Center for AIDS Research (US), National Cancer Institute (MY), Hawaii Permanente Medical Group (US), Abramson Cancer Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.