The ionomer as an oxygen evolution reaction promoter: piperidinium’s impact on mechanistic pathways on NiO, IrO ₂ , and Fe–NiO

Abstract The commercial viability of anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolysis requires optimization of various stack components, with specific catalyst-ionomer combinations often yielding higher current densities, lowered Tafel slopes, and improved mass activity. In this joint theoretical-experimental study, theoretical calculations detail the impact of Versogen’s piperidinium functional group on the complex, kinetically limiting oxygen evolution reaction, finding that the functional group can act as a promoter of specific steps (O*/O 2 * formation; H 2 O/O 2 desorption with reaction enthalpies ranging between 0.2–0.6 eV at higher coverages of O x H y intermediates) on NiO and NiFeO x catalysts. In particular, Fe sites on the NiFeO x catalyst facilitate concerted mechanisms of O*/O 2 * formation and H 2 O desorption with a low enthalpy of 0.5 eV; O 2 desorption alone requires only 0.3 eV. In contrast, Versogen-IrO 2 results in stronger Ir–O bonds, where the enthalpies for bond breaking (Ir–OH 2 and Ir–O 2 ) are considerably higher (1.4 eV and 1.6 eV, respectively). Rotating disk electrode studies utilized commercially available NiO and IrO 2 and synthesized 7.5 wt % Fe in NiFeO x catalysts in combination with Versogen, a common AEM ionomer, and Nafion, an alternative binder. Electrochemical testing validated the impact of these mechanistic changes on ionomer-catalyst combinations, finding that Versogen particularly activates NiO and NiFeO x compared to IrO 2 . Following a 13.5 h hold at 1.8 V, mass activities and Tafel slopes improved to 34 ± 13 A g −1 and 79 ± 2 mV dec −1 (NiO) and 82 ± 4.9 A g −1 and 72 ± 2 mV dec −1 (NiFeO x ). In contrast, Versogen-IrO 2 only reached 17 ± 2.9 A g −1 and 81 ± 3 mV dec −1 . Optimization of the ionomer-catalyst can yield significant increases in performance from initial activity and after an electrochemical conditioning procedure: this enhancement to the mass activity resulted in a 200.9 ± 106.1% improvement for Versogen-NiFeO x and 1284.2 ± 260.5% for Versogen-NiO. In contrast, Nafion-NiFeO x and -NiO offered moderate improvements of 39.1 ± 30.5% and 120.9 ± 59.1%, respectively.