The Ethics of Cancelling

Abstract In recent years, there has been a great deal of public debate about cancelling and cancel culture. So far though, this phenomenon has received little attention from moral philosophers. This paper addresses issue by investigating the nature of cancelling and the conditions under which it is appropriate. We begin by examining the origins of the term before investigating Linda Radzik’s account of cancelling as a form of social punishment which is morally appropriate only if the person being punished deserves it and harming them will lead to better consequences than alternative courses of action. We argue that cancelling refers to a wider range of phenomena than Radzik acknowledges. It may also be a form of reputation correction, the ending of a parasocial relationship, or a way of holding informal representatives to account. As we argue, these different kinds of moral practice call for different kinds of ethical justification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-026-10542-2
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of Cancelling

G. Mills, Alfred Archer
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

The Ethics of Cancelling

G. Mills, Alfred Archer
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, there has been a great deal of public debate about cancelling and cancel culture. So far though, this phenomenon has received little attention from moral philosophers. This paper addresses issue by investigating the nature of cancelling and the conditions under which it is appropriate. We begin by examining the origins of the term before investigating Linda Radzik’s account of cancelling as a form of social punishment which is morally appropriate only if the person being punished deserves it and harming them will lead to better consequences than alternative courses of action. We argue that cancelling refers to a wider range of phenomena than Radzik acknowledges. It may also be a form of reputation correction, the ending of a parasocial relationship, or a way of holding informal representatives to account. As we argue, these different kinds of moral practice call for different kinds of ethical justification.

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Tilburg University (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.