Beyond the bottle: factors affecting adoption of liquid urine fertilizer among smallholder farmers in Southern Malawi

Introduction The growing demand for affordable and sustainable soil fertility solutions in sub-Saharan Africa has renewed interest in human-derived organic inputs such as urine fertilizer. Despite its agronomic potential, uptake among smallholder farmers remains limited. This study examines the factors shaping awareness, adoption, and intensity of urine fertilizer use among smallholder farmers in Southern Malawi. Methods Data were collected from 251 smallholder farmers, all of whom were members of at least one organized farmer group, reflecting the strong institutional embeddedness of rural agriculture. A Triple-Hurdle Model was employed to sequentially analyze the determinants of awareness, adoption conditional on awareness, and intensity of use conditional on adoption. Descriptive statistics complemented the econometric analysis. Results Descriptive findings showed that 46 percent of farmers were aware of urine fertilizer, while 32 percent had applied it. In the first hurdle, education level and extension contact significantly increased awareness, whereas odour concerns significantly reduced it. Conditional on awareness, adoption was positively influenced by extension contact and farm size, while perceived costs and odour concerns emerged as key deterrents. The Inverse Mills Ratio was negative and statistically significant, confirming the presence of selection bias between awareness and adoption. In the third hurdle, intensity of use increased with extension contact, farm size, and poultry ownership, but declined significantly with odour-related concerns. Discussion The results indicate that while farmer organization enhances information access, actual uptake and sustained use of urine fertilizer depend on effective extension engagement, household resource endowments, and perception management. Addressing sensory concerns and cost perceptions is critical for scaling adoption. Policy interventions should prioritize demonstration-based learning, odor-mitigation strategies, and the integration of urine fertilizer into circular bioeconomy frameworks that link sanitation and agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1736709
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the bottle: factors affecting adoption of liquid urine fertilizer among smallholder farmers in Southern Malawi

Jabulani Nyengere, Ololade Latifat Abdulrahman, Gabriel Kanuti Ndimbo, Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum et al.
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Beyond the bottle: factors affecting adoption of liquid urine fertilizer among smallholder farmers in Southern Malawi

Jabulani Nyengere, Ololade Latifat Abdulrahman, Gabriel Kanuti Ndimbo, Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum, Juliana Jepkemoi Cheboi, Boineelo Pearl Lefadola, Agnes G. Kapinga, Lubobi Ferdinand Shamala, Weston Mwase, RUTH WAMBUI WAINAINA, Harineck Tholo, Precious Masuku, Tabitha C. Nindi-Chigwe, Allena Laura Njala, Chikondi Chisenga, Tiwongwe Mzumara, Jacquiline Ndosi, Mayamiko Chisale, Ato Fanyin-Martin, Judith Adejoke Falola-Olasunkanmi, Stanly Mataka
article en

Abstract

Introduction The growing demand for affordable and sustainable soil fertility solutions in sub-Saharan Africa has renewed interest in human-derived organic inputs such as urine fertilizer. Despite its agronomic potential, uptake among smallholder farmers remains limited. This study examines the factors shaping awareness, adoption, and intensity of urine fertilizer use among smallholder farmers in Southern Malawi. Methods Data were collected from 251 smallholder farmers, all of whom were members of at least one organized farmer group, reflecting the strong institutional embeddedness of rural agriculture. A Triple-Hurdle Model was employed to sequentially analyze the determinants of awareness, adoption conditional on awareness, and intensity of use conditional on adoption. Descriptive statistics complemented the econometric analysis. Results Descriptive findings showed that 46 percent of farmers were aware of urine fertilizer, while 32 percent had applied it. In the first hurdle, education level and extension contact significantly increased awareness, whereas odour concerns significantly reduced it. Conditional on awareness, adoption was positively influenced by extension contact and farm size, while perceived costs and odour concerns emerged as key deterrents. The Inverse Mills Ratio was negative and statistically significant, confirming the presence of selection bias between awareness and adoption. In the third hurdle, intensity of use increased with extension contact, farm size, and poultry ownership, but declined significantly with odour-related concerns. Discussion The results indicate that while farmer organization enhances information access, actual uptake and sustained use of urine fertilizer depend on effective extension engagement, household resource endowments, and perception management. Addressing sensory concerns and cost perceptions is critical for scaling adoption. Policy interventions should prioritize demonstration-based learning, odor-mitigation strategies, and the integration of urine fertilizer into circular bioeconomy frameworks that link sanitation and agriculture.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
University of Nairobi (KE), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (PL), Anhui Agricultural University (CN), Trout Unlimited (US), University of Botswana (BW), Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (EG), University of Dar es Salaam (TZ), Malawi University of Science and Technology (MW), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MW), Relief International (US), University of Petroleum (ID), Kwame Nkrumah University (ZM), African Centre for Technology Studies (KE), Department of Agricultural Research & Technical Services (MW), Awadhesh Pratap Singh University (IN), Kwara State University (NG)
Carnegie Corporation of New York, University of Pretoria, Malawi University of Science and Technology
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.