Proportionate Risk Management for Tax-Related AI Systems: Analysis and Implications under EU and US Law

This article analyses how emerging EU and US regulatory frameworks on artificial intelligence (AI) shape the operation of tax administrations. On the EU side, it examines how the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the AI Act jointly constrain Member State tax authorities, highlighting the tension between rights-based protections, such as data subject rights and limits on automated decision-making, and the Act’s risk-based obligations for high-risk AI systems used in tax enforcement. For the United States, the article reviews recent public-sector AI initiatives affecting the IRS, focusing on how evolving federal guidance and the repeal of the Safe and Trustworthy AI Executive Order can create uncertainty around applicable standards for tax-related AI (TAI) systems.The comparative analysis shows convergence in regulatory aims but fragmentation in implementation. To address the need to set a uniform framework of protection and the deficiencies of both approaches, the article proposes a proportionality-based risk management framework tailored to specific AI use cases in tax administration, offering structured, scalable safeguards for both authorities and taxpayers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Tax Journal
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/560kfb
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportionate Risk Management for Tax-Related AI Systems: Analysis and Implications under EU and US Law

A. Rizzo, Giorgio Hassan
World Tax Journal
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Proportionate Risk Management for Tax-Related AI Systems: Analysis and Implications under EU and US Law

A. Rizzo, Giorgio Hassan
article en

Abstract

This article analyses how emerging EU and US regulatory frameworks on artificial intelligence (AI) shape the operation of tax administrations. On the EU side, it examines how the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the AI Act jointly constrain Member State tax authorities, highlighting the tension between rights-based protections, such as data subject rights and limits on automated decision-making, and the Act’s risk-based obligations for high-risk AI systems used in tax enforcement. For the United States, the article reviews recent public-sector AI initiatives affecting the IRS, focusing on how evolving federal guidance and the repeal of the Safe and Trustworthy AI Executive Order can create uncertainty around applicable standards for tax-related AI (TAI) systems.The comparative analysis shows convergence in regulatory aims but fragmentation in implementation. To address the need to set a uniform framework of protection and the deficiencies of both approaches, the article proposes a proportionality-based risk management framework tailored to specific AI use cases in tax administration, offering structured, scalable safeguards for both authorities and taxpayers.

World Tax JournalVol. 18(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Proportionate Risk Management for Tax-Related AI Systems: Analysis and Implications under EU and US Law — A. Rizzo, Giorgio Hassan · World Tax Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS