From “Contact Zone” to “Collaborative Zone”: Multilingual Writers’ Tensions and Opportunities in the Writing Center

Writing center scholars have adopted Pratt’s (1991) “contact zone” metaphor to describe the diversity of consultants and students in writing centers, but this literature has largely overlooked the perspectives of multilingual students. Through surveys, interviews, and session data, we found that while multilingual students described rich linguistic identities, they also experienced tension and instability as language users. Students often framed their considerable language assets as deficiencies in academic writing contexts. They faced additional tension between instructor expectations and their own understanding of assignment goals. Students frequently sought native-like language competency from consultants and expected them to serve as informants about academic writing conventions—goals that often conflicted with writing center values and practices. This research suggests writing centers need to move from “clashing” to “collaboration” to understand and support multilingual students’ writing processes and goals within the context of U.S. higher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œWriting center journal
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.2106
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From “Contact Zone” to “Collaborative Zone”: Multilingual Writers’ Tensions and Opportunities in the Writing Center

Neal Lerner, Isabelle M Lundin, Qianqian Zhang-Wu
˜The œWriting center journal
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

From “Contact Zone” to “Collaborative Zone”: Multilingual Writers’ Tensions and Opportunities in the Writing Center

Neal Lerner, Isabelle M Lundin, Qianqian Zhang-Wu
article en

Abstract

Writing center scholars have adopted Pratt’s (1991) “contact zone” metaphor to describe the diversity of consultants and students in writing centers, but this literature has largely overlooked the perspectives of multilingual students. Through surveys, interviews, and session data, we found that while multilingual students described rich linguistic identities, they also experienced tension and instability as language users. Students often framed their considerable language assets as deficiencies in academic writing contexts. They faced additional tension between instructor expectations and their own understanding of assignment goals. Students frequently sought native-like language competency from consultants and expected them to serve as informants about academic writing conventions—goals that often conflicted with writing center values and practices. This research suggests writing centers need to move from “clashing” to “collaboration” to understand and support multilingual students’ writing processes and goals within the context of U.S. higher education.

˜The œWriting center journalVol. 43(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From “Contact Zone” to “Collaborative Zone”: Multilingual Writers’ Tensions and Opportunities in the Writing Center — Neal Lerner, Isabelle M Lundin, et al. · ˜The œWriting center journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS