Comparative efficacy of oral dutasteride and low-, medium-, and high-dose oral minoxidil: a six-month prospective trichoscopic and clinical study

In this exploratory, non-randomized clinical trial, oral minoxidil was associated with short-term improvements in clinical severity, while oral dutasteride did not demonstrate measurable early clinical change within the six-month follow-up. Trichoscopic findings were limited and did not consistently parallel clinical outcomes, suggesting that early therapeutic effects in routine practice may be more readily captured by clinical staging than by regional microscopic assessment. These observations should be interpreted cautiously given the study design and sample size, and they warrant confirmation in larger, randomized studies with longer follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1751116
Primary Topic
Hair Growth and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of oral dutasteride and low-, medium-, and high-dose oral minoxidil: a six-month prospective trichoscopic and clinical study

Michelle Alcocer-Salas, Valeria Carrillo-Manguart, David Cardona-Müller, Fernando Grover-Paez et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Hair Growth and Disorders
article

Comparative efficacy of oral dutasteride and low-, medium-, and high-dose oral minoxidil: a six-month prospective trichoscopic and clinical study

Michelle Alcocer-Salas, Valeria Carrillo-Manguart, David Cardona-Müller, Fernando Grover-Paez, M. Larios-Cárdenas, R. Quiñones-Hernández, L.E. Sánchez-Dueñas, E.R. Calderón-Quiroz, J.A. Moreno-Alanis, M.G. Ramos-Zavala, S. González-Ruíz, M. León Quintero-Loreto, D.G. Quiñones-Hernández
article en

Abstract

In this exploratory, non-randomized clinical trial, oral minoxidil was associated with short-term improvements in clinical severity, while oral dutasteride did not demonstrate measurable early clinical change within the six-month follow-up. Trichoscopic findings were limited and did not consistently parallel clinical outcomes, suggesting that early therapeutic effects in routine practice may be more readily captured by clinical staging than by regional microscopic assessment. These observations should be interpreted cautiously given the study design and sample size, and they warrant confirmation in larger, randomized studies with longer follow-up.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Secretaría de Salud de Jalisco (MX), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Hair Growth and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.