Over the edge: Empirical evidence for the cliff‐edge model of obstetric selection

The cliff-edge model of obstetric selection maintains that larger neonates and smaller birth canals confer a positive selective advantage until labor becomes obstructed and vaginal delivery is no longer possible, eliciting an abrupt reduction in fitness. The model postulates that even weak directional selection, on either the maternal pelvis or neonatal size, is sufficient to explain the observed incidences of fetopelvic disproportion. The regular and safe use of Caesarean sections has alleviated obstetric constraints and is expected to have increased fetopelvic disproportion rates. Using a historic Swiss dataset (babies born from 1896 to 1939) and a modern French dataset (babies born from 2011 to 2013), we calculated a composite variable, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \hat{D} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , capturing the fetopelvic fit to test the assumption that birth interventions can shift the distribution of births at risk for fetopelvic disproportion. Our findings support the prediction that the relaxation of stabilizing selection following the widespread adoption of routine Caesarean sections facilitates the continued accumulation of susceptibility to fetopelvic disproportion. The percentage of births with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo></mml:mover> <mml:mo>></mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \hat{D}>0 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , predictive of fetopelvic disproportion risk, increased from 0.05% in the historic dataset to 14.6% in the modern dataset. Within the historic dataset, head circumference was a significant predictor of Caesarean section, whereas birthweight was not. By quantifying a historic-to-modern shift in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \hat{D} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , our study applies the cliff-edge model of obstetric selection to real-world data and illustrates how medical interventions can alter the evolutionary dynamics of parturition and contribute to the persistence and amplification of susceptibility to fetopelvic disproportion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Anatomical Record
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.70159
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Over the edge: Empirical evidence for the cliff‐edge model of obstetric selection

Lara Watson, Philipp Mitterœcker, Martin Haeusler, Nicole M. Webb et al.
The Anatomical Record
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Over the edge: Empirical evidence for the cliff‐edge model of obstetric selection

Lara Watson, Philipp Mitterœcker, Martin Haeusler, Nicole M. Webb, Kaspar Staub, Pierre Frémondière
article en

Abstract

The cliff-edge model of obstetric selection maintains that larger neonates and smaller birth canals confer a positive selective advantage until labor becomes obstructed and vaginal delivery is no longer possible, eliciting an abrupt reduction in fitness. The model postulates that even weak directional selection, on either the maternal pelvis or neonatal size, is sufficient to explain the observed incidences of fetopelvic disproportion. The regular and safe use of Caesarean sections has alleviated obstetric constraints and is expected to have increased fetopelvic disproportion rates. Using a historic Swiss dataset (babies born from 1896 to 1939) and a modern French dataset (babies born from 2011 to 2013), we calculated a composite variable, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \hat{D} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , capturing the fetopelvic fit to test the assumption that birth interventions can shift the distribution of births at risk for fetopelvic disproportion. Our findings support the prediction that the relaxation of stabilizing selection following the widespread adoption of routine Caesarean sections facilitates the continued accumulation of susceptibility to fetopelvic disproportion. The percentage of births with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo></mml:mover> <mml:mo>></mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \hat{D}>0 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , predictive of fetopelvic disproportion risk, increased from 0.05% in the historic dataset to 14.6% in the modern dataset. Within the historic dataset, head circumference was a significant predictor of Caesarean section, whereas birthweight was not. By quantifying a historic-to-modern shift in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \hat{D} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , our study applies the cliff-edge model of obstetric selection to real-world data and illustrates how medical interventions can alter the evolutionary dynamics of parturition and contribute to the persistence and amplification of susceptibility to fetopelvic disproportion.

The Anatomical Record
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Vienna (AT), Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (AT), University of Zurich (CH), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Austrian Science Fund, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, Institut écologie et environnement
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.