Relationship of nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers with efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without durvalumab therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study

Nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers like modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are useful prognostic indicators, but their role in patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or GC plus durvalumab is unclear. This study investigates the relationship of these markers with treatment outcomes and survival. Chemotherapy consisted of protracted infusion of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2/day) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2/day) on day 1 and 8, or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2/day), cisplatin (25 mg/m2/day) on day 1 and 8 and durvalumab (1500 mg/day 1) given once every 21 days. After six cycles of GC plus durvalumab therapy, durvalumab monotherapy was administered at 1500 mg every 4 weeks. PNI, NLR, PLR and mGPS were assessed before treatment using established cutoffs. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were analyzed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models. The primary endpoint was OS, defined as the time from the start of chemotherapy to death. This study analyzed 103 patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with GC or GC plus durvalumab. For patients with PLR ≥ 148 the median survival was 13.7 months and for those with PLR < 148 the median OS was not estimated; this difference was significant (p = 0.016). For patients with mGPS 0–1 and 2 the median OS was 16.9 months and 7.9 months, respectively, and this difference was also significant (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that, among the nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers tested, mGPS 2 and PLR ≥ 148 significantly predicted shorter OS. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that mGPS 2 is an independent risk factor for shorter OS. A mGPS of 2 was a predictor of shorter OS for patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer receiving GC or GC plus durvalumab. Evaluating mGPS prior to treatment initiation may support planning of individualized treatments that can enable clinicians to identify patients who are likely to benefit from chemotherapy and to exercise caution when considering systemic therapy for those with mGPS 2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-026-00555-5
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship of nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers with efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without durvalumab therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study

Masafumi Kikuchi, Yumiko Akamine, Yayoi Fukushi, Koji Fukuda et al.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Relationship of nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers with efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without durvalumab therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study

Masafumi Kikuchi, Yumiko Akamine, Yayoi Fukushi, Koji Fukuda, Kazuma Fujita, Katsuya Sasaki, Hiroyuki Shibata, Haruka Igarashi
article en

Abstract

Nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers like modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are useful prognostic indicators, but their role in patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or GC plus durvalumab is unclear. This study investigates the relationship of these markers with treatment outcomes and survival. Chemotherapy consisted of protracted infusion of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2/day) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2/day) on day 1 and 8, or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2/day), cisplatin (25 mg/m2/day) on day 1 and 8 and durvalumab (1500 mg/day 1) given once every 21 days. After six cycles of GC plus durvalumab therapy, durvalumab monotherapy was administered at 1500 mg every 4 weeks. PNI, NLR, PLR and mGPS were assessed before treatment using established cutoffs. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were analyzed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models. The primary endpoint was OS, defined as the time from the start of chemotherapy to death. This study analyzed 103 patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with GC or GC plus durvalumab. For patients with PLR ≥ 148 the median survival was 13.7 months and for those with PLR < 148 the median OS was not estimated; this difference was significant (p = 0.016). For patients with mGPS 0–1 and 2 the median OS was 16.9 months and 7.9 months, respectively, and this difference was also significant (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that, among the nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers tested, mGPS 2 and PLR ≥ 148 significantly predicted shorter OS. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that mGPS 2 is an independent risk factor for shorter OS. A mGPS of 2 was a predictor of shorter OS for patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer receiving GC or GC plus durvalumab. Evaluating mGPS prior to treatment initiation may support planning of individualized treatments that can enable clinicians to identify patients who are likely to benefit from chemotherapy and to exercise caution when considering systemic therapy for those with mGPS 2.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and SciencesVol. 12(1)
Akita University (JP), Akita University Hospital (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.