No Neutral Default in Unique Reconstruction under Audit-Fixed Outcome Invariance

Preprint: This work is a preprint, has not undergone peer review, and is made publicly available to establish a public scientific record. This manuscript establishes a structural limitation within the audit-fixed intervention framework. It shows that unique reconstruction on a chosen description space cannot be treated as a neutral default consequence of increased intervention access when the audit-induced outcome partition remains invariant under admissible extensions. The result is purely protocol-level and introduces no dynamics, ontological commitments, or mechanism reconstruction. It clarifies the logical boundary between intervention access and representational admissibility under neutrality. related to: Foundations of Intervention Consistency: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18495497 and Definition of the GIT Test: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18499822 Correspondence regarding this work may be directed to:[email protected]

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18664221
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Neutral Default in Unique Reconstruction under Audit-Fixed Outcome Invariance

Detlev W. Buck, Cueneyt Kaya
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

No Neutral Default in Unique Reconstruction under Audit-Fixed Outcome Invariance

Detlev W. Buck, Cueneyt Kaya
article en

Abstract

Preprint: This work is a preprint, has not undergone peer review, and is made publicly available to establish a public scientific record. This manuscript establishes a structural limitation within the audit-fixed intervention framework. It shows that unique reconstruction on a chosen description space cannot be treated as a neutral default consequence of increased intervention access when the audit-induced outcome partition remains invariant under admissible extensions. The result is purely protocol-level and introduces no dynamics, ontological commitments, or mechanism reconstruction. It clarifies the logical boundary between intervention access and representational admissibility under neutrality. related to: Foundations of Intervention Consistency: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18495497 and Definition of the GIT Test: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18499822 Correspondence regarding this work may be directed to:[email protected]

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.