Evaluation of trabecular architecture and bone density in periradicular bone of dilacerated mandibular third molars: a cone beam computed tomography study

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the periradicular trabecular bone density (BD) and microarchitecture of dilacerated and non-dilacerated mandibular third molars using gray values (GVs) and fractal dimension (FD) derived from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This retrospective cross-sectional study included CBCT scans of 54 patients with dilacerated mandibular third molars and 60 controls without dilaceration. Root dilaceration was defined as deviation > 20° from the long axis. The dilaceration group was further divided into subgroups based on severity (angle of dilaceration > 60° vs. ≤60°). Standardized regions of interest were selected adjacent to the curvature of the roots, excluding cortical bones. GVs were automatically measured by Romexis 6.2.1 (R®software, Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), and FD was calculated via ImageJ using the box-counting method. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed, with significance set at p < 0.05. No significant differences were found between dilacerated and non-dilacerated groups in GV (437.12 ± 184.83 vs. 439.25 ± 148.90, p = 0.645) or FD (1.07 ± 0.15 vs. 1.04 ± 0.17, p = 0.204). However, when dilacerated teeth were stratified by severity, roots with > 60° curvature exhibited significantly higher FD values than those ≤ 60° (p = 0.040), whereas GV values did not differ between curvature groups (p > 0.05). Spearman’s correlation revealed no significant association between dilaceration angle and GV or FD (p > 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, fractal analysis was used as a quantitative method to assess periradicular trabecular bone changes adjacent to dilacerated root apices. Although overall GV- and FD-based metrics did not differ between dilacerated and non-dilacerated teeth, the higher FD observed in severely dilacerated roots (> 60°) suggests increased trabecular complexity in the apical region, reflecting a potential biological bone response associated with pronounced root curvature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02186-6
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of trabecular architecture and bone density in periradicular bone of dilacerated mandibular third molars: a cone beam computed tomography study

Ali Ocak, Mehmet Akyüz
BMC Medical Imaging
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Evaluation of trabecular architecture and bone density in periradicular bone of dilacerated mandibular third molars: a cone beam computed tomography study

Ali Ocak, Mehmet Akyüz
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the periradicular trabecular bone density (BD) and microarchitecture of dilacerated and non-dilacerated mandibular third molars using gray values (GVs) and fractal dimension (FD) derived from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This retrospective cross-sectional study included CBCT scans of 54 patients with dilacerated mandibular third molars and 60 controls without dilaceration. Root dilaceration was defined as deviation > 20° from the long axis. The dilaceration group was further divided into subgroups based on severity (angle of dilaceration > 60° vs. ≤60°). Standardized regions of interest were selected adjacent to the curvature of the roots, excluding cortical bones. GVs were automatically measured by Romexis 6.2.1 (R®software, Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), and FD was calculated via ImageJ using the box-counting method. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed, with significance set at p < 0.05. No significant differences were found between dilacerated and non-dilacerated groups in GV (437.12 ± 184.83 vs. 439.25 ± 148.90, p = 0.645) or FD (1.07 ± 0.15 vs. 1.04 ± 0.17, p = 0.204). However, when dilacerated teeth were stratified by severity, roots with > 60° curvature exhibited significantly higher FD values than those ≤ 60° (p = 0.040), whereas GV values did not differ between curvature groups (p > 0.05). Spearman’s correlation revealed no significant association between dilaceration angle and GV or FD (p > 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, fractal analysis was used as a quantitative method to assess periradicular trabecular bone changes adjacent to dilacerated root apices. Although overall GV- and FD-based metrics did not differ between dilacerated and non-dilacerated teeth, the higher FD observed in severely dilacerated roots (> 60°) suggests increased trabecular complexity in the apical region, reflecting a potential biological bone response associated with pronounced root curvature.

BMC Medical ImagingVol. 26(1)
Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.