General corruption scale: development and psychometric properties

Corruption is a pervasive phenomenon that erodes institutional structures and undermines social relations. Despite its widespread impact, little attention has been given to developing and providing empirical evidence of the construct validity and reliability of measures assessing individual differences in support for corruption. This study seeks to address this gap by introducing, for the first time, the General Corruption Scale and presenting the results of a research program designed to provide robust empirical evidence for the quality of its psychometric properties. In the first study, content validity was assessed by three experts using the Content Validity Coefficient, confirming the adequacy of the scale’s content. Subsequent studies employed both exploratory (n = 308) and confirmatory (n = 840) factor analyses to evaluate its factorial structure. Results supported a two-factor model comprising 26 items, organized into Perception of Corruption and Support for Corruption. The model demonstrated satisfactory fit indices and performed better than alternative measurement models. Evidence of nomological validity was established through associations with measures of jeitinho and propensity to trust. The scale is theoretically aligned with its foundational model and demonstrates evidence of validity and reliability. Further research is recommended to assess its psychometric performance across diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04177-2
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General corruption scale: development and psychometric properties

Maurício M. Sarmet, Marília Mesquita Resende, Ronaldo Pilati, Adriana Satico Ferraz et al.
BMC Psychology
Corruption and Economic Development
article

General corruption scale: development and psychometric properties

Maurício M. Sarmet, Marília Mesquita Resende, Ronaldo Pilati, Adriana Satico Ferraz, João Gabriel Modesto, Juliana Barreiros PORTO, Cicero Roberto Pereira
article en

Abstract

Corruption is a pervasive phenomenon that erodes institutional structures and undermines social relations. Despite its widespread impact, little attention has been given to developing and providing empirical evidence of the construct validity and reliability of measures assessing individual differences in support for corruption. This study seeks to address this gap by introducing, for the first time, the General Corruption Scale and presenting the results of a research program designed to provide robust empirical evidence for the quality of its psychometric properties. In the first study, content validity was assessed by three experts using the Content Validity Coefficient, confirming the adequacy of the scale’s content. Subsequent studies employed both exploratory (n = 308) and confirmatory (n = 840) factor analyses to evaluate its factorial structure. Results supported a two-factor model comprising 26 items, organized into Perception of Corruption and Support for Corruption. The model demonstrated satisfactory fit indices and performed better than alternative measurement models. Evidence of nomological validity was established through associations with measures of jeitinho and propensity to trust. The scale is theoretically aligned with its foundational model and demonstrates evidence of validity and reliability. Further research is recommended to assess its psychometric performance across diverse contexts.

BMC PsychologyVol. 14(1)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Estadual de Goiás (BR), Centro Universitário Belas Artes de São Paulo (BR), University Center of Brasília (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.