Understanding surgeons’ preference for reusable surgical materials in laparoscopic surgery: A global cross-sectional survey

Making surgical practice more sustainable can substantially reduce healthcare's environmental impact, for example by adopting reusable surgical materials. However, a gap exists between surgeons' beliefs about the necessity to reduce this environmental impact and their adoption of reusable materials. This study examines psychological factors explaining surgeons' preference for reusable surgical materials in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, to inform strategies promoting sustainable practice. Secondary analyses were conducted using global survey data from 594 surgeons (M age =45 years; 70.7% male) in 75 countries. Results showed that for trocars and surgical drapes, core explanatory variables for choosing reusable over disposable items are beliefs about personal responsibility for reducing surgical practice's environmental impact, whether changing towards sustainable surgical practice is perceived to be worth the strain on healthcare, and perceived collegial support. Preference for reusable clip applicators is statistically predicted by belief in surgical practice's need to reduce environmental impact, with other relevant variables varying by subsample. Preference for reusable gowns is predicted by beliefs about the need to reduce environmental impact, whether sustainable change is worth the strain, and perceived collegial support. Bayesian analysis showed extreme evidence for all models. These results provide stakeholders with concrete starting points to further examine interventions aimed at promoting sustainable surgical practice. In conclusion, strengthening perceived collegial support for change towards sustainable surgical practice could be a viable general strategy to strengthen surgeons' preference for reusable surgical materials. However, the relative importance of psychological factors differs by material, suggesting interventions tailored to specific materials will be most effective. • Survey study on surgeons' preference for reusable surgical materials. • Focus on psychological predictors of preference in laparoscopic surgery. • Materials studied are trocars, clip applicators, drapes, and gowns. • Responsibility and social norms are key psychological factors. • Material-specific interventions may best promote reusable material use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.147796
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding surgeons’ preference for reusable surgical materials in laparoscopic surgery: A global cross-sectional survey

Myrthe M.M. Eussen, Stijn Bluiminck, Frenk van Harreveld, Nicole D. Bouvy et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Understanding surgeons’ preference for reusable surgical materials in laparoscopic surgery: A global cross-sectional survey

Myrthe M.M. Eussen, Stijn Bluiminck, Frenk van Harreveld, Nicole D. Bouvy, Monique Chambon, Philip R. de Reuver
article en

Abstract

Making surgical practice more sustainable can substantially reduce healthcare's environmental impact, for example by adopting reusable surgical materials. However, a gap exists between surgeons' beliefs about the necessity to reduce this environmental impact and their adoption of reusable materials. This study examines psychological factors explaining surgeons' preference for reusable surgical materials in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, to inform strategies promoting sustainable practice. Secondary analyses were conducted using global survey data from 594 surgeons (M age =45 years; 70.7% male) in 75 countries. Results showed that for trocars and surgical drapes, core explanatory variables for choosing reusable over disposable items are beliefs about personal responsibility for reducing surgical practice's environmental impact, whether changing towards sustainable surgical practice is perceived to be worth the strain on healthcare, and perceived collegial support. Preference for reusable clip applicators is statistically predicted by belief in surgical practice's need to reduce environmental impact, with other relevant variables varying by subsample. Preference for reusable gowns is predicted by beliefs about the need to reduce environmental impact, whether sustainable change is worth the strain, and perceived collegial support. Bayesian analysis showed extreme evidence for all models. These results provide stakeholders with concrete starting points to further examine interventions aimed at promoting sustainable surgical practice. In conclusion, strengthening perceived collegial support for change towards sustainable surgical practice could be a viable general strategy to strengthen surgeons' preference for reusable surgical materials. However, the relative importance of psychological factors differs by material, suggesting interventions tailored to specific materials will be most effective. • Survey study on surgeons' preference for reusable surgical materials. • Focus on psychological predictors of preference in laparoscopic surgery. • Materials studied are trocars, clip applicators, drapes, and gowns. • Responsibility and social norms are key psychological factors. • Material-specific interventions may best promote reusable material use.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 546
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.