A practical non-custom abdominal corset-based approach for diaphragm motion management in stereotactic body radiotherapy

In Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), abdominal compression devices are commonly used to manage respiratory motion. The high cost, bulky design, and low patient tolerance of these devices limit utilization. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of non-custom lumbosacral corsets on respiratory motion and clinical outcomes in SBRT delivered for a heterogeneous cohort of lower thoracic and upper abdominal lesions. A total of 46 patients underwent two separate slow-CT scans with 1 mm slice thickness, with and without the corset. A “traditional lumbosacral corset with an extensile bands” was used. The diaphragm motion was evaluated with diaphragm amplitude, Δamplitude, liver and spleen artifact volumes, and their changes (Δvolume). All patients were treated with the corset during all SBRT fractions. Clinical outcomes were assessed in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests, Spearman’s correlation, and both univariate and multivariate linear regression. Paired comparisons and regression analyses were performed to assess motion reduction and its association with patient factors. The median age was 67 years (45–82), with 17 female and 29 male patients. The corset decreased the diaphragm amplitude from 1.13 cm (0.20–3.01) to 0.55 cm (0.17–1.93) (p < 0.001). Initial diaphragm amplitude ≥ 1 cm decreased − 0.84 cm; <0.5 cm decreased − 0.13 cm (p < 0.001). Following corset application, the proportion of patients with diaphragm amplitude ≤ 1 cm increased from 39.1% (n = 18) to 82.6% (n = 38), approximately doubling, while those with amplitude ≤ 0.5 cm increased from 13.0% (n = 6) to 47.8% (n = 22), representing nearly a fourfold increase. Both univariate and multivariate analyses found no significant effect of gender, age, or body mass index on Δamplitude and Δvolume values with the corset (p > 0.05). At 6 months, 73.9% of patients showed complete response. Local progression occurred in 5 (%10.9) patients. One- and two-year local control rates were 89.0% and 65.0%. Non-custom lumbosacral corsets effectively reduced diaphragm motion, particularly in patients with baseline amplitudes > 1 cm. This low-cost, and well-tolerated approach offers a reliable alternative for motion management during SBRT in radiotherapy centers lacking dedicated motion management equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02796-y
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A practical non-custom abdominal corset-based approach for diaphragm motion management in stereotactic body radiotherapy

Metin Figen, Esengül Koçak Üzel, Gulsen Pinar Soydemir, Melisa Bagci Kilic et al.
Radiation Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

A practical non-custom abdominal corset-based approach for diaphragm motion management in stereotactic body radiotherapy

Metin Figen, Esengül Koçak Üzel, Gulsen Pinar Soydemir, Melisa Bagci Kilic, Bilgehan Topalak, Meltem Kirli Bolukbas
article en

Abstract

In Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), abdominal compression devices are commonly used to manage respiratory motion. The high cost, bulky design, and low patient tolerance of these devices limit utilization. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of non-custom lumbosacral corsets on respiratory motion and clinical outcomes in SBRT delivered for a heterogeneous cohort of lower thoracic and upper abdominal lesions. A total of 46 patients underwent two separate slow-CT scans with 1 mm slice thickness, with and without the corset. A “traditional lumbosacral corset with an extensile bands” was used. The diaphragm motion was evaluated with diaphragm amplitude, Δamplitude, liver and spleen artifact volumes, and their changes (Δvolume). All patients were treated with the corset during all SBRT fractions. Clinical outcomes were assessed in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests, Spearman’s correlation, and both univariate and multivariate linear regression. Paired comparisons and regression analyses were performed to assess motion reduction and its association with patient factors. The median age was 67 years (45–82), with 17 female and 29 male patients. The corset decreased the diaphragm amplitude from 1.13 cm (0.20–3.01) to 0.55 cm (0.17–1.93) (p < 0.001). Initial diaphragm amplitude ≥ 1 cm decreased − 0.84 cm; <0.5 cm decreased − 0.13 cm (p < 0.001). Following corset application, the proportion of patients with diaphragm amplitude ≤ 1 cm increased from 39.1% (n = 18) to 82.6% (n = 38), approximately doubling, while those with amplitude ≤ 0.5 cm increased from 13.0% (n = 6) to 47.8% (n = 22), representing nearly a fourfold increase. Both univariate and multivariate analyses found no significant effect of gender, age, or body mass index on Δamplitude and Δvolume values with the corset (p > 0.05). At 6 months, 73.9% of patients showed complete response. Local progression occurred in 5 (%10.9) patients. One- and two-year local control rates were 89.0% and 65.0%. Non-custom lumbosacral corsets effectively reduced diaphragm motion, particularly in patients with baseline amplitudes > 1 cm. This low-cost, and well-tolerated approach offers a reliable alternative for motion management during SBRT in radiotherapy centers lacking dedicated motion management equipment.

Radiation OncologyVol. 21(1)
Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Maltepe University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.