Preoperative Ternary Classification of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules (AIS/MIA/IAC): ResNet-10 Outperforms Radiomics and Clinicoradiographic Models in Multicenter Study

IntroductionPreoperative differentiation among adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) is crucial for guiding ground-glass nodule (GGN) management. This multicenter study evaluated the comparative utility of deep learning (DL), radiomics, and conventional machine learning (cML)-based clinicoradiographic models for this ternary classification.MethodsWe developed four DL models (DenseNet-121, ResNet-10, ResNet-18, and VGG-13) for the ternary classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC using multicenter CT datasets. For comparative analysis, we constructed two additional classification models: (1) a radiomics model employing feature engineering through analysis of variance, recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and (2) the cML-based clinicoradiographic model utilizing 12 different classifiers. The performance of all models was evaluated using the macro area under the curve (Macro-AUC) metric.Results847 GGNs postoperatively confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma were included in this multicenter study, which were randomly split into a training set (70%, n=592) and a validation set (30%, n=255). The DL model ResNet-10 demonstrated superior performance, achieving a Macro-AUC of 0.8055 (95% CI: 0.7723-0.8387), an accuracy of 0.6300 (95% CI: 0.5541-0.6764), and an F1-score of 0.4206 (95% CI: 0.3821-0.4598). This performance surpassed that of the radiomics model, which had a Macro-AUC of 0.7801 (95% CI: 0.7432-0.8170), an accuracy of 0.6100 (95% CI: 0.5276-0.6204), and an F1-score of 0.5505 (95% CI: 0.4983-0.6017), and the cML-based clinicoradiographic model, which achieved a Macro-AUC of 0.7770 (95% CI: 0.708-0.846), an accuracy of 0.6000 (95% CI: 0.5376-0.6604), and an F1-score of 0.4438 (95% CI: 0.3925-0.4961).ConclusionThe ResNet-10 network established a novel ternary classification model for predicting the invasiveness of GGNs. This approach provides clinically actionable insights that support surgical planning and facilitate risk-adapted management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261423265
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Ternary Classification of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules (AIS/MIA/IAC): ResNet-10 Outperforms Radiomics and Clinicoradiographic Models in Multicenter Study

Sanhong Zhang, Jinqiu Deng, Wanyin Qi, Ziqiang Yang et al.
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Preoperative Ternary Classification of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules (AIS/MIA/IAC): ResNet-10 Outperforms Radiomics and Clinicoradiographic Models in Multicenter Study

Sanhong Zhang, Jinqiu Deng, Wanyin Qi, Ziqiang Yang, Zhichao Zuo, Huchuan Zhou, Dan Long
article en

Abstract

IntroductionPreoperative differentiation among adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) is crucial for guiding ground-glass nodule (GGN) management. This multicenter study evaluated the comparative utility of deep learning (DL), radiomics, and conventional machine learning (cML)-based clinicoradiographic models for this ternary classification.MethodsWe developed four DL models (DenseNet-121, ResNet-10, ResNet-18, and VGG-13) for the ternary classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC using multicenter CT datasets. For comparative analysis, we constructed two additional classification models: (1) a radiomics model employing feature engineering through analysis of variance, recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and (2) the cML-based clinicoradiographic model utilizing 12 different classifiers. The performance of all models was evaluated using the macro area under the curve (Macro-AUC) metric.Results847 GGNs postoperatively confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma were included in this multicenter study, which were randomly split into a training set (70%, n=592) and a validation set (30%, n=255). The DL model ResNet-10 demonstrated superior performance, achieving a Macro-AUC of 0.8055 (95% CI: 0.7723-0.8387), an accuracy of 0.6300 (95% CI: 0.5541-0.6764), and an F1-score of 0.4206 (95% CI: 0.3821-0.4598). This performance surpassed that of the radiomics model, which had a Macro-AUC of 0.7801 (95% CI: 0.7432-0.8170), an accuracy of 0.6100 (95% CI: 0.5276-0.6204), and an F1-score of 0.5505 (95% CI: 0.4983-0.6017), and the cML-based clinicoradiographic model, which achieved a Macro-AUC of 0.7770 (95% CI: 0.708-0.846), an accuracy of 0.6000 (95% CI: 0.5376-0.6604), and an F1-score of 0.4438 (95% CI: 0.3925-0.4961).ConclusionThe ResNet-10 network established a novel ternary classification model for predicting the invasiveness of GGNs. This approach provides clinically actionable insights that support surgical planning and facilitate risk-adapted management.

Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentVol. 25
Changsha Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN), Xiangyang Central Hospital (CN), Liuyang City Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Anyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Xiangtan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.