When palliative becomes curative? An ethical dilemma in end-stage heart failure treated with compassionate stem cell therapy: A case report

Compassionate stem cell therapy (CST) is a potential treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure who have exhausted all standard options. However, CST remains experimental. Its merits in treating heart failure are still being investigated with evidence so far suggesting limited or no sustained clinical benefit. We describe the case of a 65-year-old man receiving palliative care who underwent SCT, and whose end-of-life treatment decisions had to be reversed as a result of perceived clinical improvement. We consider the various ethical and medico-legal considerations that were weighed in the decision-making process. As access to non-standard therapies with uncertain efficacy increases, clinicians are likely to face similar challenging scenarios, but in the absence of clear guidelines. Hence, awareness of ethical and legal considerations, together with transparent, multi-disciplinary and shared decision-making, is vital to navigate these complex situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medico-Legal Journal
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172251414075
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When palliative becomes curative? An ethical dilemma in end-stage heart failure treated with compassionate stem cell therapy: A case report

P A Patel, Ameenathul M Fawzy
Medico-Legal Journal
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

When palliative becomes curative? An ethical dilemma in end-stage heart failure treated with compassionate stem cell therapy: A case report

P A Patel, Ameenathul M Fawzy
article en

Abstract

Compassionate stem cell therapy (CST) is a potential treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure who have exhausted all standard options. However, CST remains experimental. Its merits in treating heart failure are still being investigated with evidence so far suggesting limited or no sustained clinical benefit. We describe the case of a 65-year-old man receiving palliative care who underwent SCT, and whose end-of-life treatment decisions had to be reversed as a result of perceived clinical improvement. We consider the various ethical and medico-legal considerations that were weighed in the decision-making process. As access to non-standard therapies with uncertain efficacy increases, clinicians are likely to face similar challenging scenarios, but in the absence of clear guidelines. Hence, awareness of ethical and legal considerations, together with transparent, multi-disciplinary and shared decision-making, is vital to navigate these complex situations.

Medico-Legal Journal
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When palliative becomes curative? An ethical dilemma in end-stage heart failure treated with compassionate stem cell therapy: A case report — P A Patel, Ameenathul M Fawzy · Medico-Legal Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS