Validation of machine learning based scenario generators

Abstract Machine learning (ML) methods are becoming increasingly important for designing economic scenario generators for internal models. Validating data‐driven models requires different methods than validating classical, theory‐based models. We discuss two novel aspects of such validation: first, checking the multivariate distribution of risk factors, and second, detecting unwanted memorization effects. The first task is necessary because, in ML‐based methods, dependencies are driven by data rather than derived from a financial‐mathematical theory. To address this first issue, we propose using an existing test from the literature. The second task is necessary because it cannot be ruled out that ML‐based models merely reproduce empirical data rather than generating new scenarios. For the second issue, we introduce a novel memorization ratio together with a thorough discussion. We include numerical experiments based on real market data and validate a simple autoencoder‐based scenario generator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70040
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of machine learning based scenario generators

Ralf Werner, Gero Junike, Solveig Flaig
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Validation of machine learning based scenario generators

Ralf Werner, Gero Junike, Solveig Flaig
article en

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) methods are becoming increasingly important for designing economic scenario generators for internal models. Validating data‐driven models requires different methods than validating classical, theory‐based models. We discuss two novel aspects of such validation: first, checking the multivariate distribution of risk factors, and second, detecting unwanted memorization effects. The first task is necessary because, in ML‐based methods, dependencies are driven by data rather than derived from a financial‐mathematical theory. To address this first issue, we propose using an existing test from the literature. The second task is necessary because it cannot be ruled out that ML‐based models merely reproduce empirical data rather than generating new scenarios. For the second issue, we introduce a novel memorization ratio together with a thorough discussion. We include numerical experiments based on real market data and validate a simple autoencoder‐based scenario generator.

Journal of Risk & Insurance
University of Augsburg (DE), Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of machine learning based scenario generators — Ralf Werner, Gero Junike, et al. · Journal of Risk & Insurance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS