Mutual impact of feature selection and privacy-preserving mechanisms

Abstract Privacy concern has gained increased attention in data analysis, prompting the application of privacy-preserving methodologies. This includes private dataset generation techniques designed to conceal sensitive information, such as anonymization, Differential Privacy (DP), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Differentially Private GANs (DPGANs). Nonetheless, the utilization of these techniques can influence the importance of features within the privatized dataset, potentially impacting the accuracy and dependability of subsequent data analysis and machine learning models. This study presents a comprehensive and detailed comparative examination to explore the preservation of features’ significance between the privatized dataset and its original counterpart, thus addressing the challenge of information hiding in privacy-preserving techniques. Through a series of experiments, we aim to offer valuable insights into the application of private data generating techniques to uphold the relevance of features, thereby advancing privacy-conscious data analysis across diverse applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-025-02968-4
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mutual impact of feature selection and privacy-preserving mechanisms

Mina Alishahi, Vahideh Moghtadaiee, Amir Fathalizadeh, Milad Rabiei
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Mutual impact of feature selection and privacy-preserving mechanisms

Mina Alishahi, Vahideh Moghtadaiee, Amir Fathalizadeh, Milad Rabiei
article en

Abstract

Abstract Privacy concern has gained increased attention in data analysis, prompting the application of privacy-preserving methodologies. This includes private dataset generation techniques designed to conceal sensitive information, such as anonymization, Differential Privacy (DP), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Differentially Private GANs (DPGANs). Nonetheless, the utilization of these techniques can influence the importance of features within the privatized dataset, potentially impacting the accuracy and dependability of subsequent data analysis and machine learning models. This study presents a comprehensive and detailed comparative examination to explore the preservation of features’ significance between the privatized dataset and its original counterpart, thus addressing the challenge of information hiding in privacy-preserving techniques. Through a series of experiments, we aim to offer valuable insights into the application of private data generating techniques to uphold the relevance of features, thereby advancing privacy-conscious data analysis across diverse applications.

International Journal of Machine Learning and CyberneticsVol. 17(3)
Shahid Beheshti University (IR), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mutual impact of feature selection and privacy-preserving mechanisms — Mina Alishahi, Vahideh Moghtadaiee, et al. · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS