Effects of tillage practices on aggregate-associated soil organic carbon fractions and maize yield

Tillage practices can disrupt soil surface, creating loose, erodible soil layers. This significantly impacts soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, including microbial biomass carbon (MBC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), readily oxidizable organic carbon (ROC), and heavy fraction organic carbon (HFOC). SOC fractions may depend on soil aggregate size. However, the variation patterns of SOC fractions under different soil aggregate sizes and tillage practices remain unclear. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of tillage practices on SOC fractions (MBC, DOC, POC, ROC, and HFOC) within soil aggregates and to quantify the relationship between aggregate size and these SOC fractions. Seven treatment combinations were selected: two conventional tillage practices of rotary tillage (RTS) and plow-tillage (PTS) with 100% harvest maize stover mulching, and five conservation tillage practices of subsoiling+100% mulching (STS), no-tillage+30% (NTS1) and 100% (NTS2) mulching, and no-tillage & ridging+30% (NTSR1) and 60% (NTSR2) mulching. Results showed that tillage practices significantly impacted SOC fractions and maize yield (P < 0.05). Specifically, conservation tillage outperformed conventional tillage in enhancing SOC and its labile labile organic carbon (LOC, including MBC, DOC, POC, ROC) by retaining crop residues, increasing carbon inputs, and reducing mechanical disturbance. Mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) and heavy fraction organic carbon (HFOC) are classified as stable SOC fractions, and conservation tillage also promoted the accumulation of stable SOC. NTS2 was optimal for SOC accumulation in the 0-20 cm soil layer. STS promoted root carbon input in the 20-40 cm soil layer. Maize yield was the highest under STS and the lowest under RTS. Particularly, ROC (<0.053 mm) in the 0-20 cm soil layer and MBC in the 20-40 cm soil layer (>2 mm, 2-0.25 mm) remarkably affected maize yield. Overall, this study demonstrates that the STS treatment can provide an optimal pathway for achieving both high SOC sequestration and maize yield. Future research should further elucidate the coupling mechanism between microbial functional redundancy and carbon turnover dynamics under long-term tillage practices to provide theoretical support for precision agricultural management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129001
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of tillage practices on aggregate-associated soil organic carbon fractions and maize yield

Juan Li, Zhenwei Li, Yuchen Cheng, Zhanyuan Lu et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Effects of tillage practices on aggregate-associated soil organic carbon fractions and maize yield

Juan Li, Zhenwei Li, Yuchen Cheng, Zhanyuan Lu, Kun Zhao, Yejia Di, Xiuqing Wei, Jun Ye, Liyu Chen, Shuli Wei, Lei Tian
article en

Abstract

Tillage practices can disrupt soil surface, creating loose, erodible soil layers. This significantly impacts soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, including microbial biomass carbon (MBC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), readily oxidizable organic carbon (ROC), and heavy fraction organic carbon (HFOC). SOC fractions may depend on soil aggregate size. However, the variation patterns of SOC fractions under different soil aggregate sizes and tillage practices remain unclear. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of tillage practices on SOC fractions (MBC, DOC, POC, ROC, and HFOC) within soil aggregates and to quantify the relationship between aggregate size and these SOC fractions. Seven treatment combinations were selected: two conventional tillage practices of rotary tillage (RTS) and plow-tillage (PTS) with 100% harvest maize stover mulching, and five conservation tillage practices of subsoiling+100% mulching (STS), no-tillage+30% (NTS1) and 100% (NTS2) mulching, and no-tillage & ridging+30% (NTSR1) and 60% (NTSR2) mulching. Results showed that tillage practices significantly impacted SOC fractions and maize yield (P < 0.05). Specifically, conservation tillage outperformed conventional tillage in enhancing SOC and its labile labile organic carbon (LOC, including MBC, DOC, POC, ROC) by retaining crop residues, increasing carbon inputs, and reducing mechanical disturbance. Mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) and heavy fraction organic carbon (HFOC) are classified as stable SOC fractions, and conservation tillage also promoted the accumulation of stable SOC. NTS2 was optimal for SOC accumulation in the 0-20 cm soil layer. STS promoted root carbon input in the 20-40 cm soil layer. Maize yield was the highest under STS and the lowest under RTS. Particularly, ROC (<0.053 mm) in the 0-20 cm soil layer and MBC in the 20-40 cm soil layer (>2 mm, 2-0.25 mm) remarkably affected maize yield. Overall, this study demonstrates that the STS treatment can provide an optimal pathway for achieving both high SOC sequestration and maize yield. Future research should further elucidate the coupling mechanism between microbial functional redundancy and carbon turnover dynamics under long-term tillage practices to provide theoretical support for precision agricultural management.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 401
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN), Inner Mongolia University (CN), Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences (CN), Institute of Subtropical Agriculture (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.