Strength Parameter Estimation from Triaxial Data Using the Úcar Failure Criterion

Abstract This study presents a methodology for fitting the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and tensile strength (TS) of rocks and concrete material, using the nonlinear failure criterion proposed by Úcar. A selected of triaxial test data was compiled from the literature and systematically filtered to retain only data consistent with the brittle failure behaviour. For each lithology, the relationship between the principal stresses was modelled through nonlinear regression, allowing estimation of the UCS and TS parameters. These were used to calculate and adjust ξ = TS/UCS, parameter of the Úcar failure criterion, quantifying the variation using the Taylor series expansion. Failure envelopes models are proposed for the six rock types analyzed as well as for the concrete. A comparative case study based on Coburg limestone, using the proposed regression methodology of the Úcar criterion versus the Hoek and Brown criterion against Bayesian and heuristic alternatives, yielded successful results. A key advantage of the Úcar criterion is that it requires only UCS and TS as input parameters. The proposed methodology is especially valuable during the early stages of geotechnical and rock engineering projects, or under budget limitations, where experimental datasets are often sparse or unavailable. In addition, the general rock-type models developed herein enable strength prediction for intact rock in contexts where only lithology is known or available data are limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-025-03562-9
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength Parameter Estimation from Triaxial Data Using the Úcar Failure Criterion

Luís E. Arlegui, Roberto Úcar, Francisco Javier Torrijo
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Strength Parameter Estimation from Triaxial Data Using the Úcar Failure Criterion

Luís E. Arlegui, Roberto Úcar, Francisco Javier Torrijo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents a methodology for fitting the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and tensile strength (TS) of rocks and concrete material, using the nonlinear failure criterion proposed by Úcar. A selected of triaxial test data was compiled from the literature and systematically filtered to retain only data consistent with the brittle failure behaviour. For each lithology, the relationship between the principal stresses was modelled through nonlinear regression, allowing estimation of the UCS and TS parameters. These were used to calculate and adjust ξ = TS/UCS, parameter of the Úcar failure criterion, quantifying the variation using the Taylor series expansion. Failure envelopes models are proposed for the six rock types analyzed as well as for the concrete. A comparative case study based on Coburg limestone, using the proposed regression methodology of the Úcar criterion versus the Hoek and Brown criterion against Bayesian and heuristic alternatives, yielded successful results. A key advantage of the Úcar criterion is that it requires only UCS and TS as input parameters. The proposed methodology is especially valuable during the early stages of geotechnical and rock engineering projects, or under budget limitations, where experimental datasets are often sparse or unavailable. In addition, the general rock-type models developed herein enable strength prediction for intact rock in contexts where only lithology is known or available data are limited.

Geotechnical and Geological EngineeringVol. 44(2)
Universidad de Los Andes (VE), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Gobierno de Aragón, Universitat Politècnica de València
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.