The Role of Elevation, Connectivity and Land Cover on Migratory and Non‐Migratory Fish Communities in an Amazonian Riverine System

ABSTRACT Dams and deforestation are key drivers of freshwater biodiversity loss in the Amazon, as they alter river connectivity, water quality and habitat structure. This study investigates how connectivity (Reach Connectivity Index—RCI), elevation and natural land cover influence the diversity and composition of fish assemblages in a highly fragmented Amazonian river network. Based on their distinct life‐history traits, we analysed migratory and non‐migratory species separately, hypothesizing differential responses to these environmental gradients. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to evaluate the effects of RCI, elevation and land cover on species richness (alpha diversity) and the Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD, a measure of community uniqueness). Additionally, we examined the influence of these variables on community composition using distance‐based RDA and hierarchical partitioning. We found that species richness for both groups was higher at lower elevations. However, only non‐migratory species richness increased with greater connectivity (RCI), whereas migratory species richness was unaffected by RCI. For community uniqueness (LCBD), values for migratory species were higher in areas with more conserved land cover. In contrast, non‐migratory species had higher LCBD at less connected sites. Community composition analysis revealed that non‐migratory species were strongly influenced by elevation, while migratory species composition showed no significant relationship with the environmental variables analysed. Our results confirm distinct ecological responses between migratory and non‐migratory species to fragmentation, supporting our initial hypothesis. These findings underscore the critical importance of considering species' life‐history traits when planning conservation strategies and river connectivity restoration in the Amazon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70342
Primary Topic
Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Elevation, Connectivity and Land Cover on Migratory and Non‐Migratory Fish Communities in an Amazonian Riverine System

Alberto Luciano Carmassi, Jhony Vendrusculo, Hugmar Pains da Silva, Giulianna Rondineli Carmassi et al.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
article

The Role of Elevation, Connectivity and Land Cover on Migratory and Non‐Migratory Fish Communities in an Amazonian Riverine System

Alberto Luciano Carmassi, Jhony Vendrusculo, Hugmar Pains da Silva, Giulianna Rondineli Carmassi, Izaias Médice Fernandes, Claudio Henrique Zawadzki, Luzia da Silva da Lourenço
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dams and deforestation are key drivers of freshwater biodiversity loss in the Amazon, as they alter river connectivity, water quality and habitat structure. This study investigates how connectivity (Reach Connectivity Index—RCI), elevation and natural land cover influence the diversity and composition of fish assemblages in a highly fragmented Amazonian river network. Based on their distinct life‐history traits, we analysed migratory and non‐migratory species separately, hypothesizing differential responses to these environmental gradients. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to evaluate the effects of RCI, elevation and land cover on species richness (alpha diversity) and the Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD, a measure of community uniqueness). Additionally, we examined the influence of these variables on community composition using distance‐based RDA and hierarchical partitioning. We found that species richness for both groups was higher at lower elevations. However, only non‐migratory species richness increased with greater connectivity (RCI), whereas migratory species richness was unaffected by RCI. For community uniqueness (LCBD), values for migratory species were higher in areas with more conserved land cover. In contrast, non‐migratory species had higher LCBD at less connected sites. Community composition analysis revealed that non‐migratory species were strongly influenced by elevation, while migratory species composition showed no significant relationship with the environmental variables analysed. Our results confirm distinct ecological responses between migratory and non‐migratory species to fragmentation, supporting our initial hypothesis. These findings underscore the critical importance of considering species' life‐history traits when planning conservation strategies and river connectivity restoration in the Amazon.

Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsVol. 36(2)
Universidade Federal de Rondônia (BR), Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.