The Big MAC is Back: Comparative and International Issues on Material Adverse Change (MAC) Clause

712 Abstract MAC/MAE clauses are standard and boilerplate provisions, often found in Common Law jurisdictions, used in both domestic and international corporate and financial transactions. Over the years its development has been led by American and English courts in a continuous way. Therefore, revisions and updates are always emerging based on new case law, commentary from legal scholars, and feedback from practitioners. However, something that has been omitted by scholars is that MAC/MAE clauses are also highly used and drafted in Civil Law jurisdictions. The problem arises when the transplant is done directly and without drafting adaptations, creating interesting challenges. Civil Law countries use American and English case law to understand MAC/MAE clauses, which leads to many questions as to how to enforce these alien clauses alongside Civil Law traditional excuses such as force majeure or hardship (or even frustration of purpose), or considering other legal obstacles or mandatory law. This essay attempts to fill this gap and presents the latest advances on MAC/MAE clauses and highlights the main issues from comparative and international contract law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Company and Financial Law Review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2025-0028
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Big MAC is Back: Comparative and International Issues on Material Adverse Change (MAC) Clause

Sergio Long
European Company and Financial Law Review
European and International Contract Law
article

The Big MAC is Back: Comparative and International Issues on Material Adverse Change (MAC) Clause

Sergio Long
article en

Abstract

712 Abstract MAC/MAE clauses are standard and boilerplate provisions, often found in Common Law jurisdictions, used in both domestic and international corporate and financial transactions. Over the years its development has been led by American and English courts in a continuous way. Therefore, revisions and updates are always emerging based on new case law, commentary from legal scholars, and feedback from practitioners. However, something that has been omitted by scholars is that MAC/MAE clauses are also highly used and drafted in Civil Law jurisdictions. The problem arises when the transplant is done directly and without drafting adaptations, creating interesting challenges. Civil Law countries use American and English case law to understand MAC/MAE clauses, which leads to many questions as to how to enforce these alien clauses alongside Civil Law traditional excuses such as force majeure or hardship (or even frustration of purpose), or considering other legal obstacles or mandatory law. This essay attempts to fill this gap and presents the latest advances on MAC/MAE clauses and highlights the main issues from comparative and international contract law.

European Company and Financial Law ReviewVol. 22(5-6)
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.