Monitoring insecticide resistance in cotton leafhopper in relation to enzymatic activity in major cotton growing areas of central India

Insecticide resistance complicates pest management by reducing chemical effectiveness and increasing environmental pollution from higher application rates. Monitoring resistance is essential before recommending chemicals in any agro-ecological region. The present study evaluated the extent and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in the cotton leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), across major cotton-growing regions of Maharashtra, India over five consecutive years, from 2015-16 to 2019-20 at ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR) in Nagpur. The bioassay studies using IRAC protocols revealed that populations collected from the Amravati district of Maharashtra exhibited higher LC<sub>50</sub> values for all tested insecticides, including Flonicamid 50WG, Thiamethoxam 25WG, Acetamiprid 20SP, Imidacloprid 17.8SL, Monocrotophos 36SL, Acephate 75SP, Clothianidin 50WDG, and Spiromesifen 22.9SC. The tentative discriminating doses were established based on a susceptible population of A. biguttula at 1, 0.2, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, and a control of 0 ppm. Using standardized IRAC bioassay protocols, we assessed resistance levels for eight insecticides and noted significant increases in LC<sub>50</sub> values. Notably, the A. biguttula biguttula populations from Yavatmal, Chandrapur, and Amravati exhibited critical resistance to neonicotinoids and other classes of insecticides. Biochemical assays revealed elevated activities of detoxifying enzymes, including cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, carboxylesterases, and glutathione S-transferases (GST), indicating metabolic resistance as a key mechanism. Notably, Amravati populations displayed the highest enzyme activities (e.g., GST up to 555.56 pmol/min/mg protein), correlating with intense insecticide use. These findings emphasize the need for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, including insecticide rotation, biological controls, and resistant cotton hybrids, to mitigate insecticide resistance and minimise environmental impact. Regular monitoring of resistance and enzyme activity is essential for sustainable pest control in cotton ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36055-7
Primary Topic
Insect Resistance and Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring insecticide resistance in cotton leafhopper in relation to enzymatic activity in major cotton growing areas of central India

G. Sham Supreeth, L. Rajesh Chowdary, Keerthi Manikyanahalli Chandrashekara, Sujit Kumbhare et al.
Scientific Reports
Insect Resistance and Genetics
article

Monitoring insecticide resistance in cotton leafhopper in relation to enzymatic activity in major cotton growing areas of central India

G. Sham Supreeth, L. Rajesh Chowdary, Keerthi Manikyanahalli Chandrashekara, Sujit Kumbhare, Jasti Sri Vishnu Murthy, V. S. Nagarare, T. N. Madhu, G. Nagaharish, V. Chinna Babu Naik, Yenumula Gerad Prasad
article en

Abstract

Insecticide resistance complicates pest management by reducing chemical effectiveness and increasing environmental pollution from higher application rates. Monitoring resistance is essential before recommending chemicals in any agro-ecological region. The present study evaluated the extent and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in the cotton leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), across major cotton-growing regions of Maharashtra, India over five consecutive years, from 2015-16 to 2019-20 at ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR) in Nagpur. The bioassay studies using IRAC protocols revealed that populations collected from the Amravati district of Maharashtra exhibited higher LC<sub>50</sub> values for all tested insecticides, including Flonicamid 50WG, Thiamethoxam 25WG, Acetamiprid 20SP, Imidacloprid 17.8SL, Monocrotophos 36SL, Acephate 75SP, Clothianidin 50WDG, and Spiromesifen 22.9SC. The tentative discriminating doses were established based on a susceptible population of A. biguttula at 1, 0.2, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, and a control of 0 ppm. Using standardized IRAC bioassay protocols, we assessed resistance levels for eight insecticides and noted significant increases in LC<sub>50</sub> values. Notably, the A. biguttula biguttula populations from Yavatmal, Chandrapur, and Amravati exhibited critical resistance to neonicotinoids and other classes of insecticides. Biochemical assays revealed elevated activities of detoxifying enzymes, including cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, carboxylesterases, and glutathione S-transferases (GST), indicating metabolic resistance as a key mechanism. Notably, Amravati populations displayed the highest enzyme activities (e.g., GST up to 555.56 pmol/min/mg protein), correlating with intense insecticide use. These findings emphasize the need for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, including insecticide rotation, biological controls, and resistant cotton hybrids, to mitigate insecticide resistance and minimise environmental impact. Regular monitoring of resistance and enzyme activity is essential for sustainable pest control in cotton ecosystems.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University (IN), Indian Institute of Rice Research (IN), Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IN), Central Institute for Cotton Research (IN), Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (IN), Kerala Agricultural University (IN), University of Agricultural Sciences Raichur (IN)
Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Insect Resistance and Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.