Unto the Unheavenly Exodus – Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the ‘Basic Structure’ Challenge

Abstract The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) has elicited great controversies and protests by excluding illegal migrants from the benefit of expedited citizenship naturalization in India on religious classification. While the CAA has been challenged as violative of the fundamental rights of equality and non-discrimination, scholarship has neglected situating and examining the legislation’s constitutional validity on the appraisal of the application of the basic structure doctrine. This article addresses that gap by examining whether the basic structure doctrine applies to ordinary legislation like the CAA. It argues that while its applicability is not straightforward, a doctrinal analysis reveals plausible violations of core constitutional principles, including secularism, equality, and the rule of law. The article concludes that if the basic structure doctrine is invoked by the Supreme Court of India to assess the CAA’s constitutional validity, there are compelling grounds to determine that it is unconstitutional, with significant implications for ongoing constitutional litigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Legal Information
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijli-2026-2002
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unto the Unheavenly Exodus – Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the ‘Basic Structure’ Challenge

Anujay Shrivastava
International Journal of Legal Information
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Unto the Unheavenly Exodus – Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the ‘Basic Structure’ Challenge

Anujay Shrivastava
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) has elicited great controversies and protests by excluding illegal migrants from the benefit of expedited citizenship naturalization in India on religious classification. While the CAA has been challenged as violative of the fundamental rights of equality and non-discrimination, scholarship has neglected situating and examining the legislation’s constitutional validity on the appraisal of the application of the basic structure doctrine. This article addresses that gap by examining whether the basic structure doctrine applies to ordinary legislation like the CAA. It argues that while its applicability is not straightforward, a doctrinal analysis reveals plausible violations of core constitutional principles, including secularism, equality, and the rule of law. The article concludes that if the basic structure doctrine is invoked by the Supreme Court of India to assess the CAA’s constitutional validity, there are compelling grounds to determine that it is unconstitutional, with significant implications for ongoing constitutional litigation.

International Journal of Legal Information
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unto the Unheavenly Exodus – Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the ‘Basic Structure’ Challenge — Anujay Shrivastava · International Journal of Legal Information (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS