Automaticity and endings: The revivification of Alvin Lucier

This article examines Revivification (2025), a practice-based research project by Guy Ben-Ary, Nathan Thompson, Matt Gingold and Stuart Hodgetts in which cerebral organoids, grown from composer Alvin Lucier’s blood, activate a set of gong instruments in a gallery installation. The work extends Lucier’s experiments with neurofeedback and indeterminate processes into a biotechnological domain: the organoids generate a continuous musical texture shaped by biological feedback but cannot bring their activity to an end. This contrast frames a broader inquiry into how human action differs from the automatic behaviour of engineered organisms. I argue that the capacity to interrupt or cease patterned activity – present in Lucier’s use of indeterminacy – marks a key difference between humans and the organoids in Revivification . Ben-Ary and his collaborators render this lineage of musical indeterminacy materially through bioengineering, placing the installation within broader discussions of automaticity, reproduction and agency. The article concludes that Revivification underscores a specifically human ability to terminate automatic processes in this context, a capacity made audible through the work’s musical and biological systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technoetic Arts
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00148_1
Primary Topic
Music Technology and Sound Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automaticity and endings: The revivification of Alvin Lucier

G Douglas Barrett
Technoetic Arts
Music Technology and Sound Studies
article

Automaticity and endings: The revivification of Alvin Lucier

G Douglas Barrett
article en

Abstract

This article examines Revivification (2025), a practice-based research project by Guy Ben-Ary, Nathan Thompson, Matt Gingold and Stuart Hodgetts in which cerebral organoids, grown from composer Alvin Lucier’s blood, activate a set of gong instruments in a gallery installation. The work extends Lucier’s experiments with neurofeedback and indeterminate processes into a biotechnological domain: the organoids generate a continuous musical texture shaped by biological feedback but cannot bring their activity to an end. This contrast frames a broader inquiry into how human action differs from the automatic behaviour of engineered organisms. I argue that the capacity to interrupt or cease patterned activity – present in Lucier’s use of indeterminacy – marks a key difference between humans and the organoids in Revivification . Ben-Ary and his collaborators render this lineage of musical indeterminacy materially through bioengineering, placing the installation within broader discussions of automaticity, reproduction and agency. The article concludes that Revivification underscores a specifically human ability to terminate automatic processes in this context, a capacity made audible through the work’s musical and biological systems.

Technoetic ArtsVol. 23(2)
Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Music Technology and Sound Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automaticity and endings: The revivification of Alvin Lucier — G Douglas Barrett · Technoetic Arts (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS