Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 2: Accurate Assessment of Stenosis Severity

Accurate quantification of coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is essential for appropriate risk stratification and clinical decision-making, yet several technical and interpretative pitfalls can compromise diagnostic accuracy. This second part of a two-part review examines common factors that lead to overestimation or underestimation of stenosis severity, with attention to how these errors influence CAD-RADS categorization, downstream testing, and patient management. Using case-based examples, we describe key contributors to misinterpretation and present practical strategies to mitigate these pitfalls. By recognizing these nuances and employing a structured, standardized interpretive approach, readers can minimize errors in stenosis assessment and enhance the reliability of CCTA as a noninvasive tool for evaluating coronary artery disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251413195
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 2: Accurate Assessment of Stenosis Severity

Maya Wiessman, Zeynep S. Aslan, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Arzu Canan
1 citations
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
31.92
article

Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 2: Accurate Assessment of Stenosis Severity

Maya Wiessman, Zeynep S. Aslan, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Arzu Canan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate quantification of coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is essential for appropriate risk stratification and clinical decision-making, yet several technical and interpretative pitfalls can compromise diagnostic accuracy. This second part of a two-part review examines common factors that lead to overestimation or underestimation of stenosis severity, with attention to how these errors influence CAD-RADS categorization, downstream testing, and patient management. Using case-based examples, we describe key contributors to misinterpretation and present practical strategies to mitigate these pitfalls. By recognizing these nuances and employing a structured, standardized interpretive approach, readers can minimize errors in stenosis assessment and enhance the reliability of CCTA as a noninvasive tool for evaluating coronary artery disease.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Mayo Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Advanced Imaging Research (United States) (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tips and Tricks for Interpreting Coronary CT Angiography – Part 2: Accurate Assessment of Stenosis Severity — Maya Wiessman, Zeynep S. Aslan, et al. · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS