Agri-environment schemes and predator management: Impacts on brown hare populations in Hungarian farmland

Population densities of brown hare ( Lepus europaeus ) have declined markedly over recent decades across Europe, largely driven by agricultural intensification and habitat homogenization. In response, Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) were introduced to mitigate biodiversity loss. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AES on brown hare populations across Hungary from 2007 to 2014, and the influence of vegetation quality and predator control (focused on the red fox, Vulpes vulpes ) on AES effectiveness. Using data from 482 wildlife management units (WMUs), we analyzed relationships between hare densities, AES land cover (arable and grassland), vegetation quality (proportion of preferred habitats by hare), and fox reduction rates. Hare population estimates and harvest data were compared annually to a pre-AES baseline using linear mixed-effects models. We found consistent annual decline in hare densities regardless of vegetation quality. AES land cover was low (typically <10%) and had no significant positive effect on hare density. AES grasslands were often heavily grazed, reducing habitat suitability. WMUs with higher fox reduction rates had higher pre-AES baselines and steeper declines in hare densities, suggesting that predation control was insufficient for mitigating hare declines. The effects of AES land cover were not influenced by vegetation quality and predator control. Overall, our study found that AES measures in Hungary, particularly those involving grasslands, had limited effectiveness in supporting brown hare populations. We recommend increasing AES cover with more targeted, vegetation-specific AES practices and landscape-scale management to support long-term hare conservation. • Brown hare populations in Hungary declined steadily from 2007 to 2014. • Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) program had no positive effect on hare density. • Fox reduction rates had limited, negative influence on hare population trends. • Vegetation quality did not affect AES success for hare recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04120
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agri-environment schemes and predator management: Impacts on brown hare populations in Hungarian farmland

László Szemethy, Nikolett Ujhegyi, Zsolt Bíró, Norbert Keller et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Agri-environment schemes and predator management: Impacts on brown hare populations in Hungarian farmland

László Szemethy, Nikolett Ujhegyi, Zsolt Bíró, Norbert Keller, Sándor Csányi, Krisztián Katona, Veronika Bókony, Miklós Heltai
article en

Abstract

Population densities of brown hare ( Lepus europaeus ) have declined markedly over recent decades across Europe, largely driven by agricultural intensification and habitat homogenization. In response, Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) were introduced to mitigate biodiversity loss. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AES on brown hare populations across Hungary from 2007 to 2014, and the influence of vegetation quality and predator control (focused on the red fox, Vulpes vulpes ) on AES effectiveness. Using data from 482 wildlife management units (WMUs), we analyzed relationships between hare densities, AES land cover (arable and grassland), vegetation quality (proportion of preferred habitats by hare), and fox reduction rates. Hare population estimates and harvest data were compared annually to a pre-AES baseline using linear mixed-effects models. We found consistent annual decline in hare densities regardless of vegetation quality. AES land cover was low (typically <10%) and had no significant positive effect on hare density. AES grasslands were often heavily grazed, reducing habitat suitability. WMUs with higher fox reduction rates had higher pre-AES baselines and steeper declines in hare densities, suggesting that predation control was insufficient for mitigating hare declines. The effects of AES land cover were not influenced by vegetation quality and predator control. Overall, our study found that AES measures in Hungary, particularly those involving grasslands, had limited effectiveness in supporting brown hare populations. We recommend increasing AES cover with more targeted, vegetation-specific AES practices and landscape-scale management to support long-term hare conservation. • Brown hare populations in Hungary declined steadily from 2007 to 2014. • Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) program had no positive effect on hare density. • Fox reduction rates had limited, negative influence on hare population trends. • Vegetation quality did not affect AES success for hare recovery.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 66
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU), Government of Hungary (HU), Plant Protection Institute (HU), University of Pecs (HU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.