Interventions to reduce loneliness in children and adolescents (4–18 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative synthesis of study-level characteristics

Loneliness in youth is linked to poor mental and physical health, yet the effectiveness of interventions remains unclear. Given its distinct developmental presentation, this meta-analysis synthesises interventions targeting loneliness in individuals aged 4-18 to inform age-appropriate strategies. It examines the effects of interventions on loneliness and includes a narrative synthesis of intervention and sample characteristics. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies up to March 2024, focusing on interventions where loneliness was the primary target in school-aged youth. Nineteen studies were included in the SLR, of which 18 were included in the meta-analysis (6 RCTs, 6 multi-cohort, and 6 single-cohort studies). RCTs showed a small, non-significant reduction in loneliness (Hedges' g = -0.20, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.02], p = .07), with social and emotional skills training interventions being most effective. Multi-cohort studies showed a negligible effect (Hedges' g = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.07], p = .84). Single-cohort studies indicated a moderate, non-significant effect (Hedges' g = -0.55, 95% CI [-1.29, 0.18], p = .14). Interventions targeting loneliness show promise in reducing loneliness, particularly when they incorporate social and emotional learning. Future research should integrate qualitative approaches and consider loneliness within broader mental health and well-being frameworks to support the development of more comprehensive, youth-centred interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121445
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions to reduce loneliness in children and adolescents (4–18 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative synthesis of study-level characteristics

Ola Demkowicz, Lily Verity, Jennifer YF Lau, Mathias Lasgaard et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Interventions to reduce loneliness in children and adolescents (4–18 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative synthesis of study-level characteristics

Ola Demkowicz, Lily Verity, Jennifer YF Lau, Mathias Lasgaard, Pamela Qualter, Lauren Burke, Julie Christiansen
article en

Abstract

Loneliness in youth is linked to poor mental and physical health, yet the effectiveness of interventions remains unclear. Given its distinct developmental presentation, this meta-analysis synthesises interventions targeting loneliness in individuals aged 4-18 to inform age-appropriate strategies. It examines the effects of interventions on loneliness and includes a narrative synthesis of intervention and sample characteristics. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies up to March 2024, focusing on interventions where loneliness was the primary target in school-aged youth. Nineteen studies were included in the SLR, of which 18 were included in the meta-analysis (6 RCTs, 6 multi-cohort, and 6 single-cohort studies). RCTs showed a small, non-significant reduction in loneliness (Hedges' g = -0.20, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.02], p = .07), with social and emotional skills training interventions being most effective. Multi-cohort studies showed a negligible effect (Hedges' g = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.07], p = .84). Single-cohort studies indicated a moderate, non-significant effect (Hedges' g = -0.55, 95% CI [-1.29, 0.18], p = .14). Interventions targeting loneliness show promise in reducing loneliness, particularly when they incorporate social and emotional learning. Future research should integrate qualitative approaches and consider loneliness within broader mental health and well-being frameworks to support the development of more comprehensive, youth-centred interventions.

Journal of Affective DisordersVol. 403
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Manchester (GB), Central Denmark Region (DK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.