Exploring the role of cognitive job demands in job demands‐resources theory

Abstract Cognitive job demands in the JD‐R theory are surprisingly underexplored. Despite extensive research using the JD‐R model, we lack a comprehensive understanding of how cognitive job demands affect employee well‐being and do not have a widely accepted definition of these demands. This is particularly concerning, as cognitive job demands have become a crucial characteristic of the 21st‐century work environment, especially with increasing job complexity and technological advancements such as AI. Therefore, in this conceptual paper, we draw on cognitive and work psychology research to explore the concept of cognitive job demands within the JD‐R and propose a typology of these demands. We address three key questions: (1) How can cognitive job demands be defined? (2) Are cognitive job demands a challenge demand, a hindrance demand or potentially even a job resource? (3) What roles do personal and job resources play in managing cognitive job demands? This paper aims to explore cognitive demands and their effects on employees, laying the foundation for future research on the changing cognitive nature of contemporary jobs within the JD‐R framework. Our questions about cognitive demands also raise important challenges for broader JD‐R research, leading to proposals for the further development of the JD‐R theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70095
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the role of cognitive job demands in job demands‐resources theory

Konrad Kulikowski
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Exploring the role of cognitive job demands in job demands‐resources theory

Konrad Kulikowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cognitive job demands in the JD‐R theory are surprisingly underexplored. Despite extensive research using the JD‐R model, we lack a comprehensive understanding of how cognitive job demands affect employee well‐being and do not have a widely accepted definition of these demands. This is particularly concerning, as cognitive job demands have become a crucial characteristic of the 21st‐century work environment, especially with increasing job complexity and technological advancements such as AI. Therefore, in this conceptual paper, we draw on cognitive and work psychology research to explore the concept of cognitive job demands within the JD‐R and propose a typology of these demands. We address three key questions: (1) How can cognitive job demands be defined? (2) Are cognitive job demands a challenge demand, a hindrance demand or potentially even a job resource? (3) What roles do personal and job resources play in managing cognitive job demands? This paper aims to explore cognitive demands and their effects on employees, laying the foundation for future research on the changing cognitive nature of contemporary jobs within the JD‐R framework. Our questions about cognitive demands also raise important challenges for broader JD‐R research, leading to proposals for the further development of the JD‐R theory.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyVol. 99(1)
Lodz University of Technology (PL), Krakow University of Economics (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.