Understanding the “new” disruptive behavior at live music events: Group normative (mis)alignment and collective self‐regulation

Recent years have seen increased reports of disruptive behavior at live music events, leading many to question the capacity of audiences to regulate their behavior. This matters both for positive audience experience and for crowd safety. Whilst some previous studies have examined violence in music audiences, there is almost no research looking at the current phenomenon of varied forms of disruption, the psychological antecedents of disruptive behavior, and potential mitigations. We report three studies addressing these questions experientially, observationally, and statistically, with interviews ( n = 27), an ethnographic field study at a live music festival ( n performances = 13, n interviews = 44), and a pre‐registered questionnaire survey ( n = 2,025). Results suggest that audience perceptions of disruption are sometimes contingent upon perceived group norms. Reports of disruption can occur where there is normative misalignment between disparate groups in attendance at the same event. Audience members do attempt to regulate each other's behavior, based on expectations of support, but some interventions can themselves be disruptive. We offer recommendations to venues and event organizers on how to reduce disruptive behavior, based on social identity and group norms. The results from the questionnaire survey have been certified as computationally reproducible by an independent statistician.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70060
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the “new” disruptive behavior at live music events: Group normative (mis)alignment and collective self‐regulation

Freya Mills, Fiona Green, Harry M. Lewis, Sanjeedah Choudhury et al.
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Media Influence and Health
article

Understanding the “new” disruptive behavior at live music events: Group normative (mis)alignment and collective self‐regulation

Freya Mills, Fiona Green, Harry M. Lewis, Sanjeedah Choudhury, Danielle Evans, Lewis Doyle, John Drury, Zhonghao Wen, Hanna A. I. Eldarwish
article en

Abstract

Recent years have seen increased reports of disruptive behavior at live music events, leading many to question the capacity of audiences to regulate their behavior. This matters both for positive audience experience and for crowd safety. Whilst some previous studies have examined violence in music audiences, there is almost no research looking at the current phenomenon of varied forms of disruption, the psychological antecedents of disruptive behavior, and potential mitigations. We report three studies addressing these questions experientially, observationally, and statistically, with interviews ( n = 27), an ethnographic field study at a live music festival ( n performances = 13, n interviews = 44), and a pre‐registered questionnaire survey ( n = 2,025). Results suggest that audience perceptions of disruption are sometimes contingent upon perceived group norms. Reports of disruption can occur where there is normative misalignment between disparate groups in attendance at the same event. Audience members do attempt to regulate each other's behavior, based on expectations of support, but some interventions can themselves be disruptive. We offer recommendations to venues and event organizers on how to reduce disruptive behavior, based on social identity and group norms. The results from the questionnaire survey have been certified as computationally reproducible by an independent statistician.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 26(1)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Sussex (GB), University of Surrey (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.