Robotic vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a leap towards superior outcomes?

Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is one of the latest and most advanced minimally invasive surgical approaches for the treatment of pancreatic body-tail tumors. However, its superiority over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) remains not fully established. Moreover, Textbook Outcome (TO) represents an ideal short-term postoperative outcome. Yet few studies have used it as an endpoint when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical techniques. We retrospectively analyzed data from all consecutive patients who underwent standard minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) at a high-volume pancreatic center between January 2019 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as perioperative variables, were compared between the RDP and LDP groups. Additionally, we calculated the rate of TO achievement following MIDP and performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine factors independently associated with TO achievement. A total of 196 patients who underwent standard MIDP were included in the analysis, with 97 in the RDP group and 99 in the LDP group. Compared with LDP, RDP was associated with a shorter operative time (129.48 vs. 177.27 min, P < 0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, P < 0.001). The RDP group exhibited a shorter postoperative hospital stay (10 vs. 11 days, P = 0.031) and a higher TO rate (68.0% vs. 53.5%, P = 0.042), with no statistically significant differences in the incidence of major postoperative complications between the two groups. Overall, 60.7% of patients (119/196) achieved TO. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (≥ 75 years) (OR 3.758, 95% CI 1.480–9.546, P = 0.005), being overweight (OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.243–4.502, P = 0.009), and prolonged operative time (> 232 min) (OR 2.554, 95% CI 1.096–5.952, P = 0.030) were independent risk factors for failure to achieve TO after MIDP. RDP has distinct advantages, including shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and higher TO rate. For MIDP, advanced age, overweight, and prolonged operative time are associated with TO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03581-0
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a leap towards superior outcomes?

Qitao Jiang, Yiping Mou, Weiwei Jin, Chao Lu
BMC Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Robotic vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a leap towards superior outcomes?

Qitao Jiang, Yiping Mou, Weiwei Jin, Chao Lu
article en

Abstract

Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is one of the latest and most advanced minimally invasive surgical approaches for the treatment of pancreatic body-tail tumors. However, its superiority over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) remains not fully established. Moreover, Textbook Outcome (TO) represents an ideal short-term postoperative outcome. Yet few studies have used it as an endpoint when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical techniques. We retrospectively analyzed data from all consecutive patients who underwent standard minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) at a high-volume pancreatic center between January 2019 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as perioperative variables, were compared between the RDP and LDP groups. Additionally, we calculated the rate of TO achievement following MIDP and performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine factors independently associated with TO achievement. A total of 196 patients who underwent standard MIDP were included in the analysis, with 97 in the RDP group and 99 in the LDP group. Compared with LDP, RDP was associated with a shorter operative time (129.48 vs. 177.27 min, P < 0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, P < 0.001). The RDP group exhibited a shorter postoperative hospital stay (10 vs. 11 days, P = 0.031) and a higher TO rate (68.0% vs. 53.5%, P = 0.042), with no statistically significant differences in the incidence of major postoperative complications between the two groups. Overall, 60.7% of patients (119/196) achieved TO. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (≥ 75 years) (OR 3.758, 95% CI 1.480–9.546, P = 0.005), being overweight (OR 2.366, 95% CI 1.243–4.502, P = 0.009), and prolonged operative time (> 232 min) (OR 2.554, 95% CI 1.096–5.952, P = 0.030) were independent risk factors for failure to achieve TO after MIDP. RDP has distinct advantages, including shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and higher TO rate. For MIDP, advanced age, overweight, and prolonged operative time are associated with TO.

BMC SurgeryVol. 26(1)
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Shaoxing People's Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.