A more collaborative way of governing? Lessons from Australia and Canada for the UK’s Council of the Nations and Regions

One of the first acts of Sir Keir Starmer’s government was to establish the Council of the Nations and Regions, a potentially landmark innovation in the United Kingdom’s model of territorial government. As of autumn 2025, the Council has met twice. Drawing on lessons from more established intergovernmental structures and relations in Australia and Canada, this article demonstrates how this forum could fill a gap in the United Kingdom’s territorial government, which has historically lacked mechanisms for genuine collaboration. We conducted interviews with key stakeholders from all levels of government, analysed UK and international policy and practice, and identified several challenges and opportunities raised by the establishment of the Council. These include the need for more transparency about UK government’s dual role as the central government and de facto government of England; the need to differentiate between devolution as delivery versus a structure for policy autonomy and learning; and the importance of political good-will. This will be crucial in a period of greater political divergence across the UK’s administrations. We argue there is real potential for the Council of the Nations and Regions to shift the UK towards a more collaborative form of territorial government, encouraging co-operation between and across its governing authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Round Table
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2026.2625296
Primary Topic
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A more collaborative way of governing? Lessons from Australia and Canada for the UK’s Council of the Nations and Regions

Alex Walker, Dewi Knight, Michael Kenny, Hannah Ellis et al.
The Round Table
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
article

A more collaborative way of governing? Lessons from Australia and Canada for the UK’s Council of the Nations and Regions

Alex Walker, Dewi Knight, Michael Kenny, Hannah Ellis, Lottie Marsden
article en

Abstract

One of the first acts of Sir Keir Starmer’s government was to establish the Council of the Nations and Regions, a potentially landmark innovation in the United Kingdom’s model of territorial government. As of autumn 2025, the Council has met twice. Drawing on lessons from more established intergovernmental structures and relations in Australia and Canada, this article demonstrates how this forum could fill a gap in the United Kingdom’s territorial government, which has historically lacked mechanisms for genuine collaboration. We conducted interviews with key stakeholders from all levels of government, analysed UK and international policy and practice, and identified several challenges and opportunities raised by the establishment of the Council. These include the need for more transparency about UK government’s dual role as the central government and de facto government of England; the need to differentiate between devolution as delivery versus a structure for policy autonomy and learning; and the importance of political good-will. This will be crucial in a period of greater political divergence across the UK’s administrations. We argue there is real potential for the Council of the Nations and Regions to shift the UK towards a more collaborative form of territorial government, encouraging co-operation between and across its governing authorities.

The Round Table
The Open University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.