Trends and challenges in machine ethics: an updated survey of artificial moral agency implementations

Abstract The use of autonomous artificial intelligence systems in sensitive domains requires them to decide and act ethically. The field of machine ethics is dedicated to developing such artificial moral agents. This survey classifies recently published artificial moral agent implementations to identify trends and to evaluate progress on existing challenges within the field. To this end, we deploy a taxonomy composed of three dimensions: (1) ethical implementation aspects, (2) non-technical implementation aspects, and (3) technical implementation aspects. We identify a trend towards systems which are configurable with regard to the ethical theory implemented, as well as a trend towards learning-based approaches. Not using benchmarks to evaluate an agent’s performance and the lack of code availability remain open challenges. We argue that the absence of moral patient involvement is an equally big issue: those who are affected by a system’s decisions are rarely involved in specifying the ethical principles or rules according to which the system acts. The supplementary material provides short summaries of all surveyed papers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00971-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and challenges in machine ethics: an updated survey of artificial moral agency implementations

Martin Tröschel, Michael Krah
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Trends and challenges in machine ethics: an updated survey of artificial moral agency implementations

Martin Tröschel, Michael Krah
article en

Abstract

Abstract The use of autonomous artificial intelligence systems in sensitive domains requires them to decide and act ethically. The field of machine ethics is dedicated to developing such artificial moral agents. This survey classifies recently published artificial moral agent implementations to identify trends and to evaluate progress on existing challenges within the field. To this end, we deploy a taxonomy composed of three dimensions: (1) ethical implementation aspects, (2) non-technical implementation aspects, and (3) technical implementation aspects. We identify a trend towards systems which are configurable with regard to the ethical theory implemented, as well as a trend towards learning-based approaches. Not using benchmarks to evaluate an agent’s performance and the lack of code availability remain open challenges. We argue that the absence of moral patient involvement is an equally big issue: those who are affected by a system’s decisions are rarely involved in specifying the ethical principles or rules according to which the system acts. The supplementary material provides short summaries of all surveyed papers.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Oldenburger Institut für Informatik (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trends and challenges in machine ethics: an updated survey of artificial moral agency implementations — Martin Tröschel, Michael Krah · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS