Similar performance and muscle adaptations between intervals with and without blood flow restriction in well-trained cyclists

Blood flow restriction (BFR) allows exercise at a lower external load with similar or greater improvements compared with traditional training in nontrained individuals. However, the effect in well-trained competitive athletes is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare effort-matched high-intensity interval training (HIIT) microcycles performed with or without BFR on endurance performance and muscular adaptations in well-trained cyclists. Seventeen well-trained cyclists (31 ± 9 yr; V̇o<sub>2max</sub>: 67 ± 6 mL × kg<sup>-1</sup> × min<sup>-1</sup>) were randomized to groups performing five HIIT sessions (6 × 5 min intervals with 2.5 min of recovery) with (BFR) or without (HIIT) thigh cuffs occluding the legs. V̇o<sub>2max</sub>, power output at 4 mmoL/L blood lactate (LT4), mean power output during 5-min maximal cycling (MPO<sub>5 min</sub>), percentage of V̇o<sub>2max</sub> used at LT4 (%V̇o<sub>2max</sub>@LT4), hemoglobin mass, and blood volume (BV) were assessed. Muscle biopsies from <i>m. vastus lateralis</i> evaluated muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), capillaries, citrate synthase, hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4. The BFR group trained at a 42% lower power output than the HIIT group (177 ± 3 W vs. 307 ± 8 W, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.01), but with no differences in heart rate or rate of perceived exertion. Both groups improved MPO<sub>5 min</sub> by ⁓4%, with no changes in LT4, V̇o<sub>2max</sub>, hemoglobin mass, and BV. HIIT showed a significant reduction in CSA for type 2 muscle fibers compared with BFR, whereas no changes were found in the other muscle analyses. BFR applied during a 6-day interval microcycle provides similar performance gains as traditional HIIT in well-trained cyclists.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Blood flow restriction training (BFR) enables well-trained cyclists to perform high-intensity interval training (HIIT) at lower power outputs while still achieving comparable improvements in performance and muscle adaptations after a 6-day interval microcycle training. By matching effort rather than power output, this approach could help manage training load without compromising physiological gains. These findings suggest that BFR could be a tool in the training program of competitive athletes, especially during periods requiring reduced mechanical stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01038.2025
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similar performance and muscle adaptations between intervals with and without blood flow restriction in well-trained cyclists

Bent R. Rønnestad, Daniel Hammarström, Fabio Zambolin, Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming et al.
Journal of Applied Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Similar performance and muscle adaptations between intervals with and without blood flow restriction in well-trained cyclists

Bent R. Rønnestad, Daniel Hammarström, Fabio Zambolin, Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming, Øyvind Skattebo, Truls Raastad, Olav Vikmoen, Joar Hansen, Hege Nymo Ødemark, Sjur Fortun Øfsteng
article en

Abstract

Blood flow restriction (BFR) allows exercise at a lower external load with similar or greater improvements compared with traditional training in nontrained individuals. However, the effect in well-trained competitive athletes is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare effort-matched high-intensity interval training (HIIT) microcycles performed with or without BFR on endurance performance and muscular adaptations in well-trained cyclists. Seventeen well-trained cyclists (31 ± 9 yr; V̇o<sub>2max</sub>: 67 ± 6 mL × kg<sup>-1</sup> × min<sup>-1</sup>) were randomized to groups performing five HIIT sessions (6 × 5 min intervals with 2.5 min of recovery) with (BFR) or without (HIIT) thigh cuffs occluding the legs. V̇o<sub>2max</sub>, power output at 4 mmoL/L blood lactate (LT4), mean power output during 5-min maximal cycling (MPO<sub>5 min</sub>), percentage of V̇o<sub>2max</sub> used at LT4 (%V̇o<sub>2max</sub>@LT4), hemoglobin mass, and blood volume (BV) were assessed. Muscle biopsies from <i>m. vastus lateralis</i> evaluated muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), capillaries, citrate synthase, hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4. The BFR group trained at a 42% lower power output than the HIIT group (177 ± 3 W vs. 307 ± 8 W, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.01), but with no differences in heart rate or rate of perceived exertion. Both groups improved MPO<sub>5 min</sub> by ⁓4%, with no changes in LT4, V̇o<sub>2max</sub>, hemoglobin mass, and BV. HIIT showed a significant reduction in CSA for type 2 muscle fibers compared with BFR, whereas no changes were found in the other muscle analyses. BFR applied during a 6-day interval microcycle provides similar performance gains as traditional HIIT in well-trained cyclists.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Blood flow restriction training (BFR) enables well-trained cyclists to perform high-intensity interval training (HIIT) at lower power outputs while still achieving comparable improvements in performance and muscle adaptations after a 6-day interval microcycle training. By matching effort rather than power output, this approach could help manage training load without compromising physiological gains. These findings suggest that BFR could be a tool in the training program of competitive athletes, especially during periods requiring reduced mechanical stress.

Journal of Applied PhysiologyVol. 140(3)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO), University of Inland Norway (NO), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.