Benchmarking augmentation to enhance A-line and B-line classification with sparse data

In real-life medical applications, there is often no curated data available for training machine learning solutions. In this article, we explore the efficacy of various ways of addressing this issue, such as extending the training set using historical data, data transformation, and data augmentation. We conducted experiments on lung ultrasound data for A-line and B-line artifact detection. The dataset used was acquired from real-life examinations done in a hospital where physicians labeled approximately every tenth frame, resulting in sparsely labeled data. We expanded this dataset using historical ultrasound scans from various probe types and evaluated two transformation strategies—standard resizing and edge padding—alongside several augmentation methods. The biggest improvement in F1-score was from 0.69 to 0.86 for A-line detection, and from 0.53 to 0.8 for B-line detection. These results prove the utility of carefully chosen data transformation and augmentation when training on sparsely labeled data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3436
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking augmentation to enhance A-line and B-line classification with sparse data

Zuzana Trabalková, Martin Števík, Marek Malík, Dominik Vranay et al.
PeerJ Computer Science
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Benchmarking augmentation to enhance A-line and B-line classification with sparse data

Zuzana Trabalková, Martin Števík, Marek Malík, Dominik Vranay, Anton Dzian, Maroš Hliboký, Štefánia Vetešková, Ján Magyar, Martina Szabóová, Ján Paralič
article en

Abstract

In real-life medical applications, there is often no curated data available for training machine learning solutions. In this article, we explore the efficacy of various ways of addressing this issue, such as extending the training set using historical data, data transformation, and data augmentation. We conducted experiments on lung ultrasound data for A-line and B-line artifact detection. The dataset used was acquired from real-life examinations done in a hospital where physicians labeled approximately every tenth frame, resulting in sparsely labeled data. We expanded this dataset using historical ultrasound scans from various probe types and evaluated two transformation strategies—standard resizing and edge padding—alongside several augmentation methods. The biggest improvement in F1-score was from 0.69 to 0.86 for A-line detection, and from 0.53 to 0.8 for B-line detection. These results prove the utility of carefully chosen data transformation and augmentation when training on sparsely labeled data.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 12
Technical University of Košice (SK), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.