Quantifying groundwater drought hazards with the groundwater level deficit anomaly index (GLDAI)

Abstract Droughts diminish groundwater availability by reducing recharge and intensifying abstraction, yet most drought indices emphasize anomalies without quantifying the underlying deficit in groundwater storage. Drawing on 25 years of drought research, this study introduces the groundwater level deficit anomaly index (GLDAI), a metric that jointly represents groundwater anomalies and their associated deficits to better characterize drought severity. GLDAI captures dynamic groundwater responses by translating deviations from observed levels into meaningful deficit estimates, thereby offering a clearer depiction of hydrological stress than anomaly only indicators. Using monthly groundwater level records from 1,847 monitoring wells across Germany, GLDAI successfully identifies major groundwater droughts (1992, 2003, 2018–2020, 2021) while reducing severity estimates by 22.75% relative to anomaly based indices. Unlike the standardized groundwater level index (SGLI), which relies solely on long-term statistical deviations, GLDAI incorporates both groundwater demand and deficit magnitude. This distinction is critical in regions with shallow aquifers or high natural variability, where anomaly based indices may overestimate drought conditions by classifying statistically low, but hydrologically sufficient, levels as severe drought. A comparative assessment shows that from 1992 to 2021, the proportion of months classified as drought decreased by 4.4% when using GLDAI (SGLI: 19.7%; GLDAI: 15.3%). These findings demonstrate that GLDAI reduces overestimation of drought severity and provides a more realistic representation of groundwater stress. As such, GLDAI offers a robust framework for regional-to-global drought risk assessments and supports more effective groundwater management and mitigation planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrogeology Journal
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-026-03021-6
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying groundwater drought hazards with the groundwater level deficit anomaly index (GLDAI)

Robert Reinecke, Andreas Hartmann, Eklavyya Popat
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Quantifying groundwater drought hazards with the groundwater level deficit anomaly index (GLDAI)

Robert Reinecke, Andreas Hartmann, Eklavyya Popat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Droughts diminish groundwater availability by reducing recharge and intensifying abstraction, yet most drought indices emphasize anomalies without quantifying the underlying deficit in groundwater storage. Drawing on 25 years of drought research, this study introduces the groundwater level deficit anomaly index (GLDAI), a metric that jointly represents groundwater anomalies and their associated deficits to better characterize drought severity. GLDAI captures dynamic groundwater responses by translating deviations from observed levels into meaningful deficit estimates, thereby offering a clearer depiction of hydrological stress than anomaly only indicators. Using monthly groundwater level records from 1,847 monitoring wells across Germany, GLDAI successfully identifies major groundwater droughts (1992, 2003, 2018–2020, 2021) while reducing severity estimates by 22.75% relative to anomaly based indices. Unlike the standardized groundwater level index (SGLI), which relies solely on long-term statistical deviations, GLDAI incorporates both groundwater demand and deficit magnitude. This distinction is critical in regions with shallow aquifers or high natural variability, where anomaly based indices may overestimate drought conditions by classifying statistically low, but hydrologically sufficient, levels as severe drought. A comparative assessment shows that from 1992 to 2021, the proportion of months classified as drought decreased by 4.4% when using GLDAI (SGLI: 19.7%; GLDAI: 15.3%). These findings demonstrate that GLDAI reduces overestimation of drought severity and provides a more realistic representation of groundwater stress. As such, GLDAI offers a robust framework for regional-to-global drought risk assessments and supports more effective groundwater management and mitigation planning.

Hydrogeology Journal
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Groundwater Center (DE), CDM Smith (United States) (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.