A nonparametric dependent competing risk method for net survival analysis

Quantifying disease-specific survival in patients with competing risks is generally done when reliable cause of death (CoD) information is available. With known CoD, cause-specific and cumulative incidence functions for competing risk data are applicable in estimating disease-specific survival. When CoD is unreliable, unknown, or subject to misspecifications, relative survival methods are used for estimating disease-specific survival. This estimator, under the independent competing risks assumption, is the ratio of all-cause survival in the disease-specific cohort group to the known expected survival from a general reference population. The disease-specific death competes with other causes of mortality, potentially creating interdependence among the CoD. The standard ratio estimate is only valid when death from disease and death from competing causes are independent. We relaxed this assumption by formulating the dependence between the times to disease-specific death and competing causes of mortality using a copula. We fit a nonparametric copula-based approach to the distribution of disease-specific death which reduces to the ratio estimator under independence. This nonparametric method is robust compared to the previously proposed copula-based parametric method. We demonstrate the utility of our method through simulation studies and an application to French breast cancer registry data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Biostatistics
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2024-0035
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A nonparametric dependent competing risk method for net survival analysis

Aurélien Latouche, Reuben Adatorwovor
The International Journal of Biostatistics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

A nonparametric dependent competing risk method for net survival analysis

Aurélien Latouche, Reuben Adatorwovor
article en

Abstract

Quantifying disease-specific survival in patients with competing risks is generally done when reliable cause of death (CoD) information is available. With known CoD, cause-specific and cumulative incidence functions for competing risk data are applicable in estimating disease-specific survival. When CoD is unreliable, unknown, or subject to misspecifications, relative survival methods are used for estimating disease-specific survival. This estimator, under the independent competing risks assumption, is the ratio of all-cause survival in the disease-specific cohort group to the known expected survival from a general reference population. The disease-specific death competes with other causes of mortality, potentially creating interdependence among the CoD. The standard ratio estimate is only valid when death from disease and death from competing causes are independent. We relaxed this assumption by formulating the dependence between the times to disease-specific death and competing causes of mortality using a copula. We fit a nonparametric copula-based approach to the distribution of disease-specific death which reduces to the ratio estimator under independence. This nonparametric method is robust compared to the previously proposed copula-based parametric method. We demonstrate the utility of our method through simulation studies and an application to French breast cancer registry data.

The International Journal of Biostatistics
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), University of Kentucky (US), Inserm (FR), National Cancer Institute (US), Cancer Genetics (United States) (US), Institut Curie (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.