Assessment of the Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system: a mobile, multi-inlet system for continuous emissions monitoring

Abstract. The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) has developed and trialled a mobile and remotely-operated Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system for continuous measurements of emissions at the facility spatial scale. FEDS is capable of both locating and quantifying emission sources over long-term periods and has been deployed at sites around the UK to monitor methane emissions from the natural gas network, landfill, and waste treatment. This work presents assessment activities using a controlled release facility (CRF) to test the performance of the measurement system and two reverse dispersion models (Airviro and WindTrax) for emission quantification. The CRF was used to simulate a simple single-point methane emission source with constant release rate of 1 kg h−1 over four separate experiments. Emissions were quantified using prior knowledge of release timings as well as in the absence of this knowledge. High variability in wind direction was shown to negatively impact emission quantification accuracy (especially for Airviro). Emission results were improved by removing periods of high wind variability (low wind persistence) from analysis. Both models performed better when using daily-averaging periods for emissions (Airviro RMSE = 0.37 kg h−1 (37 % relative); WindTrax = 0.29 kg h−1 (29 %)) over shorter averaging periods, such as hourly data (Airviro RMSE = 0.77 kg h−1 (77 %); WindTrax = 2.19 kg h−1 (219 %)). Estimated emission rates were shown to be sensitive to the specified source release height for both models, with discrepancies in model release height relative to the true release height of more than 0.5 m yielding less accurate results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1117-2026
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system: a mobile, multi-inlet system for continuous emissions monitoring

Jamie Ryan, Jessica Connolly, F. Innocenti, D. A. Butterfield et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Assessment of the Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system: a mobile, multi-inlet system for continuous emissions monitoring

Jamie Ryan, Jessica Connolly, F. Innocenti, D. A. Butterfield, Neil Howes, Nigel Yarrow, J.T. Shaw, Rod Robinson, Jon Helmore, Dragos E. Buculei
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) has developed and trialled a mobile and remotely-operated Fugitive Emission Distributed Sampling (FEDS) system for continuous measurements of emissions at the facility spatial scale. FEDS is capable of both locating and quantifying emission sources over long-term periods and has been deployed at sites around the UK to monitor methane emissions from the natural gas network, landfill, and waste treatment. This work presents assessment activities using a controlled release facility (CRF) to test the performance of the measurement system and two reverse dispersion models (Airviro and WindTrax) for emission quantification. The CRF was used to simulate a simple single-point methane emission source with constant release rate of 1 kg h−1 over four separate experiments. Emissions were quantified using prior knowledge of release timings as well as in the absence of this knowledge. High variability in wind direction was shown to negatively impact emission quantification accuracy (especially for Airviro). Emission results were improved by removing periods of high wind variability (low wind persistence) from analysis. Both models performed better when using daily-averaging periods for emissions (Airviro RMSE = 0.37 kg h−1 (37 % relative); WindTrax = 0.29 kg h−1 (29 %)) over shorter averaging periods, such as hourly data (Airviro RMSE = 0.77 kg h−1 (77 %); WindTrax = 2.19 kg h−1 (219 %)). Estimated emission rates were shown to be sensitive to the specified source release height for both models, with discrepancies in model release height relative to the true release height of more than 0.5 m yielding less accurate results.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 19(3)
National Physical Laboratory (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.