Comparison of the enzymatic and cellular profiles of clinical JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myelofibrosis

• Ruxolitinib is the most selective and potent of the JAKinibs indicated for treating myelofibrosis. • Other JAKinibs show broader kinase inhibition, potentially contributing to off-target toxicities. Four Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib are indicated for myelofibrosis. All inhibit JAK2, but effects on additional kinases vary markedly, shaping their specific clinical pharmacology. Published comparative inhibitory profiles and cellular pharmacology data are incomplete and were determined here. Inhibitory potency and relative selectivity of JAKinibs were determined by full kinome profiling. JAKinib effects on signaling and cell growth were measured using JAK2-dependent and JAK2-independent cell lines. Ruxolitinib was the most potent JAK2 inhibitor (IC 50 at physiological (1 mM) ATP, 2.9 nM), followed by fedratinib (17 nM), momelotinib (29 nM), and pacritinib (39 nM), and the most selective. The other JAKinibs inhibited multiple additional kinases beyond the few typically reported for each drug in the literature. Interestingly, pacritinib and momelotinib showed only modest ACVR1 inhibition at clinical doses and physiological ATP concentrations, suggesting the role of ACVR1 inhibition in mediating their anemia-related benefits may be overestimated. The observed inhibitory levels are unlikely to translate to a clinically meaningful reduction in hepcidin levels. In JAK2-dependent cellular assays, ruxolitinib showed most potent inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation (IC 50, 14 nM), followed by momelotinib (201 nM), pacritinib (421 nM), and fedratinib (669 nM), and was the only JAKinib that had minimal impact on growth in JAK2-independent cell lines. In conclusion, ruxolitinib was the most potent, and selective JAKinib with no relevant effects in JAK2-independent cells. In contrast, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib inhibited many other kinases and inhibited cell growth by JAK2-unrelated mechanisms at clinically relevant concentrations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Neoplasia
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bneo.2026.100206
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the enzymatic and cellular profiles of clinical JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Gaurang Trivedi, Kamna Katiyar, Ricardo Macarrón, Angelo B. A. Laranjeira et al.
Blood Neoplasia
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparison of the enzymatic and cellular profiles of clinical JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Gaurang Trivedi, Kamna Katiyar, Ricardo Macarrón, Angelo B. A. Laranjeira, Nina Zolotarjova, Katherine Drake, Hamza Celik, Amanda Smith, Alex Margulis, Brittney Wass, Guofeng Zhang, Maryanne Covington
article en

Abstract

• Ruxolitinib is the most selective and potent of the JAKinibs indicated for treating myelofibrosis. • Other JAKinibs show broader kinase inhibition, potentially contributing to off-target toxicities. Four Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib are indicated for myelofibrosis. All inhibit JAK2, but effects on additional kinases vary markedly, shaping their specific clinical pharmacology. Published comparative inhibitory profiles and cellular pharmacology data are incomplete and were determined here. Inhibitory potency and relative selectivity of JAKinibs were determined by full kinome profiling. JAKinib effects on signaling and cell growth were measured using JAK2-dependent and JAK2-independent cell lines. Ruxolitinib was the most potent JAK2 inhibitor (IC 50 at physiological (1 mM) ATP, 2.9 nM), followed by fedratinib (17 nM), momelotinib (29 nM), and pacritinib (39 nM), and the most selective. The other JAKinibs inhibited multiple additional kinases beyond the few typically reported for each drug in the literature. Interestingly, pacritinib and momelotinib showed only modest ACVR1 inhibition at clinical doses and physiological ATP concentrations, suggesting the role of ACVR1 inhibition in mediating their anemia-related benefits may be overestimated. The observed inhibitory levels are unlikely to translate to a clinically meaningful reduction in hepcidin levels. In JAK2-dependent cellular assays, ruxolitinib showed most potent inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation (IC 50, 14 nM), followed by momelotinib (201 nM), pacritinib (421 nM), and fedratinib (669 nM), and was the only JAKinib that had minimal impact on growth in JAK2-independent cell lines. In conclusion, ruxolitinib was the most potent, and selective JAKinib with no relevant effects in JAK2-independent cells. In contrast, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib inhibited many other kinases and inhibited cell growth by JAK2-unrelated mechanisms at clinically relevant concentrations.

Blood Neoplasia
Incyte (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.