Conflict as text and as narrative universe

Abstract The article proposes an analysis of conflict as a network of antagonistic relations in its diachronic dimension, whose elements are expressed in narratives. The concept “conflict” is treated as an abstract category that lacks a concrete referent, even though certain facts, phenomena, or artifacts may be conceptualized as its manifestations. The argument demonstrates that when such conceptualizations take on a narrative character, the set of such narratives becomes a dynamic textual universe. The article also highlights the role of pragmatics in the reception of such narratives. They can be read at the denotative or the engaged (emic) level. The latter allows the reception of individual narratives (or even their recognizable attributes) as a gateway to a universe of content, in which, among other things, binary oppositions encode information about the structure of the social world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Semiotic Studies
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2025-0073
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conflict as text and as narrative universe

Jakub Sadowski
Language and Semiotic Studies
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Conflict as text and as narrative universe

Jakub Sadowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article proposes an analysis of conflict as a network of antagonistic relations in its diachronic dimension, whose elements are expressed in narratives. The concept “conflict” is treated as an abstract category that lacks a concrete referent, even though certain facts, phenomena, or artifacts may be conceptualized as its manifestations. The argument demonstrates that when such conceptualizations take on a narrative character, the set of such narratives becomes a dynamic textual universe. The article also highlights the role of pragmatics in the reception of such narratives. They can be read at the denotative or the engaged (emic) level. The latter allows the reception of individual narratives (or even their recognizable attributes) as a gateway to a universe of content, in which, among other things, binary oppositions encode information about the structure of the social world.

Language and Semiotic Studies
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.