Exploring Dynamics of Korea’s Short-Term Energy Transition: A Multi-Level Perspective Approach

The energy transition takes a long time and requires a complex process involving stakeholder consensus. This study aims to explore the political, economic, and sociocultural dynamics that emerged during the short-term energy transition between the Moon and Yoon administrations in Korea, assessing the current energy transition, which stands at a crossroads, and provides conclusions and implications to inform future decisions on the findings. To this purpose, a multi-level perspective analytical framework was applied to investigate the two administrations’ conflicting energy transition mechanisms on the level of actors, technologies, and rules/institutions. According to the results, the Moon administration pursued a reconfiguration pathway of limited changes by attempting to phase out nuclear power plants and expand renewable energy, while the Yoon administration promoted a transformation pathway of partial change by abandoning the policy of phasing out nuclear power plants and further expanding existing nuclear energy. Differences in pathways were found to stem from differentiation based on political ideology and political purposes among key actors, rather than socio-technological innovation. This paper argues that Korea’s short-term energy transition was hastily pursued amidst a lack of public discourse, insufficient technological development, and institutional deficiencies, ultimately blocking the pathway to a desirable energy transition and having Korea locked in its existing energy system. This paper also suggests that no single pathway exists to carbon neutrality, and that future administrations can find desirable pathways by overcoming challenges and dilemmas through continuous improvement and adjustment.