The development and psychometric evaluation of a nursing professional resilience scale in China

Professional resilience, rather than career resilience, is an important attribute for nurses’ retention in the profession. The concept of nursing professional resilience has just been clarified through a grounded theory study, but the evaluating scale was still lacking. To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a nursing professional resilience scale (NPRS). This study was conducted in accordance with DeVellis’s guidelines for scale development. The initial items were adopted from qualitative interviews and previous psychological/career resilience scales. The revised scale was tested via a sample of 479 nurses and refined through expert review and factor analysis. Content validity was evaluated by five experts; construct validity was explored through exploratory factor analysis and confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity were investigated, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. The final scale comprised 19 items distributed across five dimensions: positive personality traits (4 items), professional adaptability (3 items), interpersonal quotient (6 items), perceived support (3 items), and impervious to public opinion (3 items). Content validity was determined to be 0.98. The goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 291.2/141, RMSEA = 0.071, NFI = 0.893, TLI = 0.929, CFI = 0.941, RFI = 0.870, IFI = 0.942) indicated a reasonable fit for the model. AVE values of the factors were calculated at between 0.563 and 0.684, CR2 values between 0.796 and 0.885 and MSV values between 0.754 and 0.825. The Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability coefficient, and test-retest reliability coefficient were 0.938, 0.885, and 0.946 for the overall scale. The Nursing Professional Resilience Scale exhibited good reliability and validity when applied to Chinese nurses. This study provides a valid measurement instrument for subsequent research related to nurses’ mental health, career development education, and resilience-related policy development in Chinese healthcare context. The external validity could be examined in future large-scale studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04196-z
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development and psychometric evaluation of a nursing professional resilience scale in China

Sulan Lin, Lizhen Liu, Vivian Xi Wu, Xianhong Li et al.
BMC Psychology
Resilience and Mental Health
article

The development and psychometric evaluation of a nursing professional resilience scale in China

Sulan Lin, Lizhen Liu, Vivian Xi Wu, Xianhong Li, Yajing Xian, Yan Liang, Fangqun Cheng, Yunfan Li
article en

Abstract

Professional resilience, rather than career resilience, is an important attribute for nurses’ retention in the profession. The concept of nursing professional resilience has just been clarified through a grounded theory study, but the evaluating scale was still lacking. To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a nursing professional resilience scale (NPRS). This study was conducted in accordance with DeVellis’s guidelines for scale development. The initial items were adopted from qualitative interviews and previous psychological/career resilience scales. The revised scale was tested via a sample of 479 nurses and refined through expert review and factor analysis. Content validity was evaluated by five experts; construct validity was explored through exploratory factor analysis and confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity were investigated, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. The final scale comprised 19 items distributed across five dimensions: positive personality traits (4 items), professional adaptability (3 items), interpersonal quotient (6 items), perceived support (3 items), and impervious to public opinion (3 items). Content validity was determined to be 0.98. The goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 291.2/141, RMSEA = 0.071, NFI = 0.893, TLI = 0.929, CFI = 0.941, RFI = 0.870, IFI = 0.942) indicated a reasonable fit for the model. AVE values of the factors were calculated at between 0.563 and 0.684, CR2 values between 0.796 and 0.885 and MSV values between 0.754 and 0.825. The Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability coefficient, and test-retest reliability coefficient were 0.938, 0.885, and 0.946 for the overall scale. The Nursing Professional Resilience Scale exhibited good reliability and validity when applied to Chinese nurses. This study provides a valid measurement instrument for subsequent research related to nurses’ mental health, career development education, and resilience-related policy development in Chinese healthcare context. The external validity could be examined in future large-scale studies.

BMC PsychologyVol. 14(1)
Central South University (CN), Xinjiang Medical University (CN), National University of Singapore (SG), Xiangyang Central Hospital (CN), Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN), Clinical Nutrition Research Centre (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.