Structural equivalence between reinforced NSC, UHPC and UHPFRC beams

Purpose Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) are a new generation of concrete that have demonstrated superior performance in relation to normal-strength concrete (NSC). This study aims to integrate the mechanical data proposed in the literature (obtained from small-scale experimental tests) and use them to create a consistent finite element analysis (FEA) model for UHPC and UHPFRC structures and comparing them with NSC models. Design/methodology/approach An FEA application with Abaqus software was used on real-scale beams, and the results were compared with NSC to assess their load-bending equivalence. Findings UHPC–UHPFRC structures reduce total concrete consumption by 39.0%–56.4% when compared to NSC, resulting in a dead load reduction of 1.6–2.2 times. The use of UHPC–UHPFRC led to a reduction in total steel consumption (reinforcement) by 56.7%. The ultimate limit state of the beams is not affected by using steel fibers in UHPC structures. Originality/value The mechanical equivalence of these elements is not well known and the parametric data to create FEA models are unclear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Structural Integrity
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-11-2025-0296
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural equivalence between reinforced NSC, UHPC and UHPFRC beams

Fabrício Longhi Bolina, João Paulo C. Rodrigues
International Journal of Structural Integrity
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
article

Structural equivalence between reinforced NSC, UHPC and UHPFRC beams

Fabrício Longhi Bolina, João Paulo C. Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

Purpose Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) are a new generation of concrete that have demonstrated superior performance in relation to normal-strength concrete (NSC). This study aims to integrate the mechanical data proposed in the literature (obtained from small-scale experimental tests) and use them to create a consistent finite element analysis (FEA) model for UHPC and UHPFRC structures and comparing them with NSC models. Design/methodology/approach An FEA application with Abaqus software was used on real-scale beams, and the results were compared with NSC to assess their load-bending equivalence. Findings UHPC–UHPFRC structures reduce total concrete consumption by 39.0%–56.4% when compared to NSC, resulting in a dead load reduction of 1.6–2.2 times. The use of UHPC–UHPFRC led to a reduction in total steel consumption (reinforcement) by 56.7%. The ultimate limit state of the beams is not affected by using steel fibers in UHPC structures. Originality/value The mechanical equivalence of these elements is not well known and the parametric data to create FEA models are unclear.

International Journal of Structural Integrity
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Coimbra (PT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.