A systematic review of machine learning for digital stain processing in pathology

Digital staining involves using methods such as Machine Learning (ML) to replace chemical staining in pathology. Staining adds contrast that makes cell details more visible under the microscope. However, chemical methods are slow, use toxic reagents, and require skilled personnel. In contrast, digital staining can generate images faster, reduce the need for reagents and specialized equipment, and minimize plastic and chemical waste, making the workflow more sustainable. This paper systematically reviews papers published on ML-based digital stain processing. We propose a new taxonomy that divides existing studies into five groups: stain normalization, stain augmentation, virtual staining, stain transformation, and hybrid approaches. In addition, we observed several trends from the reviewed papers. Finally, we outline open research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocomputing
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133064
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of machine learning for digital stain processing in pathology

Ching Y. Suen, Rabiah Al-qudah, Abubakar Bala, Khiati Abdel Ilah Zakaria et al.
Neurocomputing
AI in cancer detection
article

A systematic review of machine learning for digital stain processing in pathology

Ching Y. Suen, Rabiah Al-qudah, Abubakar Bala, Khiati Abdel Ilah Zakaria, Mrouj AlMuhajiri
article en

Abstract

Digital staining involves using methods such as Machine Learning (ML) to replace chemical staining in pathology. Staining adds contrast that makes cell details more visible under the microscope. However, chemical methods are slow, use toxic reagents, and require skilled personnel. In contrast, digital staining can generate images faster, reduce the need for reagents and specialized equipment, and minimize plastic and chemical waste, making the workflow more sustainable. This paper systematically reviews papers published on ML-based digital stain processing. We propose a new taxonomy that divides existing studies into five groups: stain normalization, stain augmentation, virtual staining, stain transformation, and hybrid approaches. In addition, we observed several trends from the reviewed papers. Finally, we outline open research directions.

NeurocomputingVol. 676
Monash University Malaysia (MY), Abu Dhabi University (AE), Concordia University (CA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A systematic review of machine learning for digital stain processing in pathology — Ching Y. Suen, Rabiah Al-qudah, et al. · Neurocomputing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS