Top-cutting reduces seed return and seedbank replenishment in important grass weed species, supporting regenerative agriculture

Top-cutting (‘weed-surfing’) is a pre-harvest strategy that reduces weed seedbank inputs by mechanically removing weed seed heads before seed shedding. To be effective, it requires weeds to set their inflorescences above the crop canopy. Here, a multi-factor two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this approach for four economically important grass species using two winter wheat varieties. The results demonstrate that efficacy is highly species-specific and dependent on cutting frequency and climatic conditions. While three repeated cutting treatments provided the highest level of control, a single cut, particularly applied at an early reproductive phase, was largely ineffective, removing less than 39 % of heads in the best case. The ‘mid-single cutting’ and ‘two-cutting’ treatments demonstrated intermediate and similar efficacy, reaching up to 81.9 %. Avena fatua was the most susceptible, with three cuts removing 92–96 % of seed heads. Lolium multiflorum was also well-controlled (69–80 % removal). The technique offered moderate, yearly variable efficacy against Alopecurus myosuroides (37–75 % removal) and was largely ineffective against Bromus secalinus (4–73 % removal), particularly in a drier year. A shorter-strawed wheat variety consistently improved removal efficacy by 14–35 % for A. myosuroides and B. secalinus . Furthermore, compensatory head production was limited and context-dependent, observed mainly in A. myosuroides and L. multiflorum in the wetter year. While early cutting removed fewer seed heads, it resulted in low seed viability (<8 %) from the cut heads across all species. In contrast, seeds from heads cut later showed high viability for A. myosuroides and B. secalinus (86–97 %) but consistently low for A. fatua and L. multiflorum (≤44 %). This study demonstrates that top-cutting, when applied once at mid, twice (early and mid), or thrice (early, mid, and late) during the reproductive phase, is a practical approach for minimising seed return, combating herbicide resistance, and a valuable non-chemical component of integrated weed management, particularly for regenerative systems. • Top-cutting is a pre-harvest strategy that prevents seed return to the seedbank. • Efficacy is highly dependent on weed species, crop variety, and year. • Cutting once at mid- or early- and mid-reproductive phases is most efficient and economic. • Avena fatua and Lolium multiflorum are best candidates (≤96 % and ≤80 % removal). • Shorter wheat varieties improve interception efficacy by 14–35 %.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2026.128043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Top-cutting reduces seed return and seedbank replenishment in important grass weed species, supporting regenerative agriculture

Lena Ulber, Chun Long Liu, S. R. Moss, J. Cussans et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
31.34
article

Top-cutting reduces seed return and seedbank replenishment in important grass weed species, supporting regenerative agriculture

Lena Ulber, Chun Long Liu, S. R. Moss, J. Cussans, Shaun Coutts, Jasper Kanomanyanga, Eric S. Ober
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Top-cutting (‘weed-surfing’) is a pre-harvest strategy that reduces weed seedbank inputs by mechanically removing weed seed heads before seed shedding. To be effective, it requires weeds to set their inflorescences above the crop canopy. Here, a multi-factor two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this approach for four economically important grass species using two winter wheat varieties. The results demonstrate that efficacy is highly species-specific and dependent on cutting frequency and climatic conditions. While three repeated cutting treatments provided the highest level of control, a single cut, particularly applied at an early reproductive phase, was largely ineffective, removing less than 39 % of heads in the best case. The ‘mid-single cutting’ and ‘two-cutting’ treatments demonstrated intermediate and similar efficacy, reaching up to 81.9 %. Avena fatua was the most susceptible, with three cuts removing 92–96 % of seed heads. Lolium multiflorum was also well-controlled (69–80 % removal). The technique offered moderate, yearly variable efficacy against Alopecurus myosuroides (37–75 % removal) and was largely ineffective against Bromus secalinus (4–73 % removal), particularly in a drier year. A shorter-strawed wheat variety consistently improved removal efficacy by 14–35 % for A. myosuroides and B. secalinus . Furthermore, compensatory head production was limited and context-dependent, observed mainly in A. myosuroides and L. multiflorum in the wetter year. While early cutting removed fewer seed heads, it resulted in low seed viability (<8 %) from the cut heads across all species. In contrast, seeds from heads cut later showed high viability for A. myosuroides and B. secalinus (86–97 %) but consistently low for A. fatua and L. multiflorum (≤44 %). This study demonstrates that top-cutting, when applied once at mid, twice (early and mid), or thrice (early, mid, and late) during the reproductive phase, is a practical approach for minimising seed return, combating herbicide resistance, and a valuable non-chemical component of integrated weed management, particularly for regenerative systems. • Top-cutting is a pre-harvest strategy that prevents seed return to the seedbank. • Efficacy is highly dependent on weed species, crop variety, and year. • Cutting once at mid- or early- and mid-reproductive phases is most efficient and economic. • Avena fatua and Lolium multiflorum are best candidates (≤96 % and ≤80 % removal). • Shorter wheat varieties improve interception efficacy by 14–35 %.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 176
Julius Kühn-Institut (DE), National Institute of Agricultural Botany (GB), Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) (GB), Syngenta (United Kingdom) (GB), A-T Society (GB), University of Lincoln (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
31.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.